From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Mahdi Faramarzpour <mahdifrmx@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, kshitiz.bartariya@zohomail.in
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] udp: add drop count for packets in udp_prod_queue
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:25:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05b086b3-c82d-4aba-b185-2d39ba968a72@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <willemdebruijn.kernel.2b69585efeb5a@gmail.com>
On 1/23/26 3:41 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> I think that doing the SNMP accounting in __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb()
>> (for `to_drop`), __udp_queue_rcv_skb() and __udpv6_queue_rcv_skb() (for
>> `skb`) is a little confusing and possible error prone in the long run.
>>
>> I'm wondering if something alike the following (completely untested, not
>> even built! just to give the idea) would be better?
>
> I don't see the error prone issue with the simpler patch.
> But SGTM if you prefer this.
It's not a big deal but if we need to update the UDP MIB someday having
to look in different places could cause missing something.
The code I proposed could be made smaller with something alike the
following (still completely untested), which in turn looks quite alike
what this patch is heading, I guess. So really it's not a big deal.
---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 1db63db7e5d4..431de8dda0d3 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1793,6 +1795,7 @@ int __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
}
}
+ atomic_sub(total_size, &udp_prod_queue->rmem_alloc);
if (unlikely(to_drop)) {
for (nb = 0; to_drop != NULL; nb++) {
skb = to_drop;
@@ -1802,10 +1805,9 @@ int __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
sk_skb_reason_drop(sk, skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_PROTO_MEM);
}
numa_drop_add(&udp_sk(sk)->drop_counters, nb);
+ return nb;
}
- atomic_sub(total_size, &udp_prod_queue->rmem_alloc);
-
return 0;
drop:
@@ -2345,6 +2347,9 @@ static int __udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
}
rc = __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb(sk, skb);
+ if (likely(!rc))
+ return 0;
+
if (rc < 0) {
int is_udplite = IS_UDPLITE(sk);
int drop_reason;
@@ -2365,6 +2370,9 @@ static int __udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
return -1;
}
+ /* rc > 0, packets dropped after dequeueing from prod_queue */
+ SNMP_ADD_STATS(__UDPX_MIB(sk, true), UDP_MIB_MEMERRORS, rc);
+ SNMP_ADD_STATS(__UDPX_MIB(sk, true), UDP_MIB_INERRORS, rc);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
index 010b909275dd..df895096669e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
@@ -793,6 +793,9 @@ static int __udpv6_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
}
rc = __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb(sk, skb);
+ if (likely(!rc))
+ return 0;
+
if (rc < 0) {
int is_udplite = IS_UDPLITE(sk);
enum skb_drop_reason drop_reason;
@@ -813,6 +816,9 @@ static int __udpv6_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
return -1;
}
+ /* rc > 0, packets dropped after dequeueing from prod_queue */
+ SNMP_ADD_STATS(__UDPX_MIB(sk, false), UDP_MIB_MEMERRORS, rc);
+ SNMP_ADD_STATS(__UDPX_MIB(sk, false), UDP_MIB_INERRORS, rc);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 18:53 [PATCH net-next] udp: add drop count for packets in udp_prod_queue Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-22 21:26 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-01-23 8:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-01-23 14:41 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-01-23 15:25 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-01-24 15:36 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-01-24 6:20 ` Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-24 15:32 ` Willem de Bruijn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-29 8:38 Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-29 17:17 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-01-29 17:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-01-31 1:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-01-28 7:03 Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-28 11:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-01-28 12:27 ` Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-28 12:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-01-28 14:56 ` Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-28 18:54 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-01-08 10:29 Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-08 15:05 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-01-05 11:47 Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-06 1:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-06 6:11 ` Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-06 19:22 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-01-07 9:27 ` Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-07 15:09 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-01-07 21:46 ` Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-07 22:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-01-06 23:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-05 7:12 Mahdi Faramarzpour
2026-01-04 10:57 Mahdi Faramarzpour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05b086b3-c82d-4aba-b185-2d39ba968a72@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kshitiz.bartariya@zohomail.in \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mahdifrmx@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox