From: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: correct zerocopy refcnt with newly allocated UDP or RAW uarg
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 02:02:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0627950da21443c2b422d9861e81bf3a@huawei.com> (raw)
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:17 AM linmiaohe <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>
>I don't think that can happen.
>
>The question is when this branch is false
>
> next = (u32)atomic_read(&sk->sk_zckey);
> if ((u32)(uarg->id + uarg->len) == next) {
>
>I cannot come up with a case. I think it might be vestigial. The goal is to ensure to append only a consecutive range of notification IDs.
>Each notification ID corresponds to a sendmsg invocation with MSG_ZEROCOPY. In both TCP and UDP with corking, data is ordered and access to changes to these fields happen together as a transaction:
>
> /* realloc only when socket is locked (TCP, UDP cork),
> * so uarg->len and sk_zckey access is serialized
> */
So what I concerned is just a theoretically problems. If we can always guarantee sock_zerocopy_realloc only returns the existing uarg or NULL when on skb_zcopy(skb),
bad things won't happen.
Many thanks for your detailed explaination.
next reply other threads:[~2020-08-16 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-15 2:02 linmiaohe [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-08-14 8:17 [PATCH] net: correct zerocopy refcnt with newly allocated UDP or RAW uarg linmiaohe
2020-08-14 15:44 ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-08-13 11:58 Miaohe Lin
2020-08-13 12:34 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0627950da21443c2b422d9861e81bf3a@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).