From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Laight Subject: RE: [net-next 05/16] i40e: fix long lines Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:02:27 +0000 Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D457950@AcuExch.aculab.com> References: <1389344336-1558-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <1389344336-1558-6-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <1389344869.24222.31.camel@joe-AO722> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" , Mitch Williams , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "gospo@redhat.com" , "sassmann@redhat.com" , Jesse Brandeburg To: 'Joe Perches' , Jeff Kirsher Return-path: Received: from mx0.aculab.com ([213.249.233.131]:37913 "HELO mx0.aculab.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752964AbaAJKES convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 05:04:18 -0500 Received: from mx0.aculab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx0.aculab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 02141-01 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:04:16 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <1389344869.24222.31.camel@joe-AO722> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_common.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_common.c > [] > > @@ -681,7 +681,8 @@ aq_add_vsi_exit: > > * @cmd_details: pointer to command details structure or NULL > > **/ > > i40e_status i40e_aq_set_vsi_unicast_promiscuous(struct i40e_hw *hw, > > - u16 seid, bool set, struct i40e_asq_cmd_details *cmd_details) > > + u16 seid, bool set, > > + struct i40e_asq_cmd_details *cmd_details) > > Another way this could be changed is to put the > return value on a separate line like: > > i40e_status > i40e_aq_set_vsi_unicast_promiscuous(struct i40e_hw *hw, u16 seid, bool set, > struct i40e_asq_cmd_details *cmd_details) Personally I prefer that so I can find the definition by grepping for '^function_name' - but it doesn't seem to be done in any linux source files. > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_prototype.h > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_prototype.h > [] > > @@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ i40e_status i40e_aq_set_vsi_broadcast(struct i40e_hw *hw, > > u16 vsi_id, bool set_filter, > > struct i40e_asq_cmd_details *cmd_details); > > i40e_status i40e_aq_set_vsi_unicast_promiscuous(struct i40e_hw *hw, > > - u16 vsi_id, bool set, struct i40e_asq_cmd_details *cmd_details); > > + u16 vsi_id, bool set, struct i40e_asq_cmd_details *cmd_details); > > i40e_status > i40e_aq_set_vsi_unicast_promiscuous(struct i40e_hw *hw, u16 vsi_id, bool set, > struct i40e_asq_cmd_details *cmd_details); > > etc... > > but once you use extremely long 35+ characters > function names, 80 columns gets a bit silly too. Again this only a real problem when the coding stand requires that continuation lines have the parameters lined up under the '('. If they are indented by 4 spaces (as many of the BSDs do) then you do stand a chance of laying out a call in a reasonable number of vertical lines. My Actual preferred layout is to exclude tabs, indent by 4 spaces and double-indent continuation lines. I'll also start continuation lines (of expressions) with an operator to make it even clearer they are continuation lines. When I'm scan-reading code I tend to concentrate on the LHS of each line. - so that is where the information need to be. Not that I expect Linux to change! (Other code bases have much worse layout rules.) David