From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Laight Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] netns: fix net_generic() "id - 1" bloat Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 12:49:41 +0000 Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DB0234CCB@AcuExch.aculab.com> References: <20161202012132.GD31170@avx2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "xemul@openvz.org" To: 'Alexey Dobriyan' , "davem@davemloft.net" Return-path: Received: from smtp-out6.electric.net ([192.162.217.184]:54957 "EHLO smtp-out6.electric.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750841AbcLEMts (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 07:49:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161202012132.GD31170@avx2> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Alexey Dobriyan > Sent: 02 December 2016 01:22 > net_generic() function is both a) inline and b) used ~600 times. > > It has the following code inside > > ... > ptr = ng->ptr[id - 1]; > ... > > "id" is never compile time constant so compiler is forced to subtract 1. > And those decrements or LEA [r32 - 1] instructions add up. > > We also start id'ing from 1 to catch bugs where pernet sybsystem id > is not initialized and 0. This is quite pointless idea (nothing will > work or immediate interference with first registered subsystem) in > general but it hints what needs to be done for code size reduction. > > Namely, overlaying allocation of pointer array and fixed part of > structure in the beginning and using usual base-0 addressing. > > Ids are just cookies, their exact values do not matter, so lets start > with 3 on x86_64. ... > struct net_generic { > - struct { > - unsigned int len; > - struct rcu_head rcu; > - } s; > - > - void *ptr[0]; > + union { > + struct { > + unsigned int len; > + struct rcu_head rcu; > + } s; > + > + void *ptr[0]; > + }; > }; That union is an accident waiting to happen. What might work is to offset the Ids by (offsetof(struct net_generic, ptr)/sizeof (void *)) instead of by 1. The subtract from the offset will then counter the structure offset - which is what you are trying to achieve. David.