From: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,
alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
guwen@linux.alibaba.com, mjambigi@linux.ibm.com,
sidraya@linux.ibm.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/smc: use the correct ndev to find pnetid by pnetid table
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:09:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0720fd9f-e5b4-4706-8483-ace1ecb22c8b@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80afe99b-ca14-4b21-a200-1d695ed6ae63@linux.ibm.com>
On 2025/3/13 15:46, Wenjia Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 04.03.25 13:43, Guangguan Wang wrote:
>> When using smc_pnet in SMC, it will only search the pnetid in the
>> base_ndev of the netdev hierarchy(both HW PNETID and User-defined
>> sw pnetid). This may not work for some scenarios when using SMC in
>> container on cloud environment.
>> In container, there have choices of different container network,
>> such as directly using host network, virtual network IPVLAN, veth,
>> etc. Different choices of container network have different netdev
>> hierarchy. Examples of netdev hierarchy show below. (eth0 and eth1
>> in host below is the netdev directly related to the physical device).
>> _______________________________
>> | _________________ |
>> | |POD | |
>> | | | |
>> | | eth0_________ | |
>> | |____| |__| |
>> | | | |
>> | | | |
>> | eth1|base_ndev| eth0_______ |
>> | | | | RDMA ||
>> | host |_________| |_______||
>> ---------------------------------
>> netdev hierarchy if directly using host network
>> ________________________________
>> | _________________ |
>> | |POD __________ | |
>> | | |upper_ndev| | |
>> | |eth0|__________| | |
>> | |_______|_________| |
>> | |lower netdev |
>> | __|______ |
>> | eth1| | eth0_______ |
>> | |base_ndev| | RDMA ||
>> | host |_________| |_______||
>> ---------------------------------
>> netdev hierarchy if using IPVLAN
>> _______________________________
>> | _____________________ |
>> | |POD _________ | |
>> | | |base_ndev|| |
>> | |eth0(veth)|_________|| |
>> | |____________|________| |
>> | |pairs |
>> | _______|_ |
>> | | | eth0_______ |
>> | veth|base_ndev| | RDMA ||
>> | |_________| |_______||
>> | _________ |
>> | eth1|base_ndev| |
>> | host |_________| |
>> ---------------------------------
>> netdev hierarchy if using veth
>> Due to some reasons, the eth1 in host is not RDMA attached netdevice,
>> pnetid is needed to map the eth1(in host) with RDMA device so that POD
>> can do SMC-R. Because the eth1(in host) is managed by CNI plugin(such
>> as Terway, network management plugin in container environment), and in
>> cloud environment the eth(in host) can dynamically be inserted by CNI
>> when POD create and dynamically be removed by CNI when POD destroy and
>> no POD related to the eth(in host) anymore. It is hard to config the
>> pnetid to the eth1(in host). But it is easy to config the pnetid to the
>> netdevice which can be seen in POD. When do SMC-R, both the container
>> directly using host network and the container using veth network can
>> successfully match the RDMA device, because the configured pnetid netdev
>> is a base_ndev. But the container using IPVLAN can not successfully
>> match the RDMA device and 0x03030000 fallback happens, because the
>> configured pnetid netdev is not a base_ndev. Additionally, if config
>> pnetid to the eth1(in host) also can not work for matching RDMA device
>> when using veth network and doing SMC-R in POD.
>>
>> To resolve the problems list above, this patch extends to search user
>> -defined sw pnetid in the clc handshake ndev when no pnetid can be found
>> in the base_ndev, and the base_ndev take precedence over ndev for backward
>> compatibility. This patch also can unify the pnetid setup of different
>> network choices list above in container(Config user-defined sw pnetid in
>> the netdevice can be seen in POD).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> net/smc/smc_pnet.c | 8 +++++---
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
>> index 716808f374a8..b391c2ef463f 100644
>> --- a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
>> +++ b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
>> @@ -1079,14 +1079,16 @@ static void smc_pnet_find_roce_by_pnetid(struct net_device *ndev,
>> struct smc_init_info *ini)
>> {
>> u8 ndev_pnetid[SMC_MAX_PNETID_LEN];
>> + struct net_device *base_ndev;
>> struct net *net;
>> - ndev = pnet_find_base_ndev(ndev);
>> + base_ndev = pnet_find_base_ndev(ndev);
>> net = dev_net(ndev);
>> - if (smc_pnetid_by_dev_port(ndev->dev.parent, ndev->dev_port,
>> + if (smc_pnetid_by_dev_port(base_ndev->dev.parent, base_ndev->dev_port,
>> ndev_pnetid) &&
>> + smc_pnet_find_ndev_pnetid_by_table(base_ndev, ndev_pnetid) &&
>> smc_pnet_find_ndev_pnetid_by_table(ndev, ndev_pnetid)) {
>> - smc_pnet_find_rdma_dev(ndev, ini);
>> + smc_pnet_find_rdma_dev(base_ndev, ini);
>> return; /* pnetid could not be determined */
>> }
>> _smc_pnet_find_roce_by_pnetid(ndev_pnetid, ini, NULL, net);
>
> Hi Guangguan,
>
> sorry for the late answer! It looks good to me. Here is my R-b:
>
> Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
>
Thanks, Wenjia.
> Btw. could you give Halil some time for the review? He also wants to have a look.
It is OK.
Regards,
Guangguan Wang
>
> Thanks,
> Wenjia
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-13 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 12:43 [PATCH net-next v2] net/smc: use the correct ndev to find pnetid by pnetid table Guangguan Wang
2025-03-11 8:59 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-03-11 14:36 ` Wenjia Zhang
2025-03-13 7:46 ` Wenjia Zhang
2025-03-13 8:09 ` Guangguan Wang [this message]
2025-03-13 15:42 ` Halil Pasic
2025-03-14 13:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0720fd9f-e5b4-4706-8483-ace1ecb22c8b@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).