From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Artem Lytkin <iprintercanon@gmail.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <horms@kernel.org>,
<chrisw@sous-sol.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rtnetlink: truncate IFLA_VFINFO_LIST instead of overflowing its length
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 02:17:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0773587b-b355-46cb-9f4a-f3eecf8e01ad@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729185513.52564971@kernel.org>
On 7/29/2026 6:55 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:22:36 +0300 Artem Lytkin wrote:
>> rtnl_fill_vf() closes the IFLA_VFINFO_LIST nest with nla_nest_end(),
>> which stores the accumulated length into nla_len. That field is a u16,
>> so a nest larger than 65535 bytes is written truncated modulo 65536.
>>
>> The skb is sized by if_nlmsg_size(), which adds rtnl_vfinfo_size() for
>> every VF, so the buffer really is large enough for the whole list and
>> none of the nla_put() calls in rtnl_fill_vfinfo() fails. The overflow is
>> therefore silent. Userspace then walks the message with RTA_NEXT(),
>> which advances by the stored length, so parsing resumes inside VF
>> payload and the top-level attributes that follow the nest are read out
>> of VF data. Those are IFLA_VF_PORTS, IFLA_XDP, IFLA_LINKINFO,
>> IFLA_PERM_ADDRESS and IFLA_PROP_LIST. iproute2 prints "!!!Deficit", and
>> strictly validating parsers reject the message outright.
>>
>> rtnl_fill_vfinfo() emits 296 bytes per VF on a 64-bit kernel with
>> efficient unaligned access, so the nest wraps at 222 VFs; without
>> CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS it is 328 bytes and 200 VFs, and
>> with ndo_get_vf_guid 336 bytes and 196 VFs. ice supports up to 256 VFs
>> per PF (ICE_MAX_SRIOV_VFS), so this is reachable on shipping hardware.
>> Requests that set RTEXT_FILTER_SKIP_STATS need 335 VFs, which the 256-VF
>> limit puts out of reach, so plain "ip link show" is fine today while
>> "ip -s link show" is not.
>
> We should cap the output at known values and document them as the max
> the interface supports. "The number depends on attr set and random
> things like CPU alignment requirements" sounds like a terrible uAPI
> contract.
>
> Perhaps 128 with stats and 256 without?
>
This seems reasonable to me.
>> On CONFIG_DEBUG_NET kernels nla_nest_end() now also splats via
>> DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(), added along with nla_nest_end_safe() in commit
>> 1346586a9ac9 ("netlink: add a nla_nest_end_safe() helper").
>>
>> Using nla_nest_end_safe() here would not help: a nest that does not fit
>> in a u16 will not fit in a retried skb either, so returning -EMSGSIZE
>> would turn "ip link show" on such a device into a hard failure. Bound
>> the nest in the writer instead, as suggested when this was last
>> discussed: drop the VF that would push it past U16_MAX and end the list
>> there. Userspace sees IFLA_NUM_VF unchanged and a shorter
>> IFLA_VFINFO_LIST, and everything after the nest stays parsable. An empty
>> nest is already emitted for a PF with no VFs, so a list shorter than
>> IFLA_NUM_VF is not a new encoding.
>>
>> The other large nests in rtnl_fill_ifinfo() were audited and cannot
>> overflow: IFLA_AF_SPEC is bounded by a handful of address families at
>> about a kilobyte each, and IFLA_VF_PORTS would need more than 560 VFs.
>>
>> Fixes: c02db8c6290b ("rtnetlink: make SR-IOV VF interface symmetric")
>
> Not a fix - this is along standing limitation of the interface.
I'd argue this is a "fix", as we were previously doing objectively the
wrong thing by randomly truncating the message at arbitrary points.
That being said, this *is* a well known limitation of the interface that
has been around for a while, so I can accept the argument not to tag it
as a fix for net.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-25 13:22 [PATCH net] rtnetlink: truncate IFLA_VFINFO_LIST instead of overflowing its length Artem Lytkin
2026-07-30 1:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-30 9:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2] rtnetlink: cap IFLA_VFINFO_LIST at a documented number of VFs Artem Lytkin
2026-07-30 9:17 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0773587b-b355-46cb-9f4a-f3eecf8e01ad@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=iprintercanon@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox