From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: iproute2 - modifying routes in place Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 10:00:46 -0700 Message-ID: <07d96b60-68e5-8c20-8505-3df9178f9f78@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ryan Whelan , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.83.43]:41405 "EHLO mail-pg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751010AbeELRBB (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 May 2018 13:01:01 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id w4-v6so2082397pgq.8 for ; Sat, 12 May 2018 10:01:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 5/11/18 4:42 AM, Ryan Whelan wrote: > `ip route` has 2 subcommands that don't seem to work as expected and i'm > not sure if its a bug, or if i'm misunderstanding the semantics. Can you try with ipv6/route-bugs branch in https://github.com/dsahern/linux