From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>, Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
davem@davemloft.net, mkubecek@suse.cz, martin.lau@linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool-next] rxclass: Make output for RSS context action explicit
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 03:30:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07e69b19-36c2-ece4-734f-e2189b950cab@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241112072434.71dc5236@kernel.org>
On 12/11/2024 15:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Hm, interesting idea...
> Practically speaking I think it introduces complexity and I'm not sure
> anyone will actually benefit (IOW why would anyone want to keep /
> create context for inactive queues?).
Conceivably to save re-configuring them next time they increase the
queues again? But I suppose anyone doing that kind of complicated
demand-flexible tuning will be using some kind of userland software
that can automate that.
Anyway I don't have a dog in this fight as sfc doesn't support ethtool
set-channels. (Which will make it difficult for me to test this; had
I better extend netdevsim to support RSS & rxnfc?)
> My gut feeling is that we should just leave a comment for posterity
> somewhere in the code but continue to validate both based on rules
> and based on "direct" context membership.
Will do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 19:32 [PATCH ethtool-next] rxclass: Make output for RSS context action explicit Daniel Xu
2024-11-08 19:35 ` Daniel Xu
2024-11-08 19:56 ` Edward Cree
2024-11-08 20:34 ` Joe Damato
2024-11-08 20:43 ` Joe Damato
2024-11-08 21:13 ` Edward Cree
2024-11-08 22:50 ` Daniel Xu
2024-11-09 17:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-11 10:47 ` Edward Cree
2024-11-11 18:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-12 9:24 ` Edward Cree
2024-11-12 15:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-13 3:30 ` Edward Cree [this message]
2024-11-14 0:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-14 0:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-14 23:04 ` Edward Cree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07e69b19-36c2-ece4-734f-e2189b950cab@gmail.com \
--to=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).