* [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: test_run: Remove ipv6_bpf_stub usage
@ 2026-03-23 22:52 Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-24 2:16 ` sun jian
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin KaFai Lau @ 2026-03-23 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: 'Alexei Starovoitov ', 'Andrii Nakryiko ',
'Daniel Borkmann ', netdev, Jakub Kicinski,
Fernando Fernandez Mancera
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
bpf_prog_test_run_skb() uses net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry for
BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT test runs.
It currently checks ipv6_bpf_stub before using ip6_null_entry.
ipv6_bpf_stub will be removed by the CONFIG_IPV6=m support removal
series posted at [1], so switch this check to ipv6_mod_enabled()
instead.
This change depends on that series [1]. Without it, CONFIG_IPV6=m is
still possible, and net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry remains NULL until
the IPv6 module is loaded.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260320185649.5411-1-fmancera@suse.de/
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
net/bpf/test_run.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 56bc8dc1e281..fb25184ed03b 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -1157,15 +1157,12 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
}
if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT) {
- if (!ipv6_bpf_stub) {
- pr_warn_once("Please test this program with the IPv6 module loaded\n");
+ if (!ipv6_mod_enabled()) {
+ pr_warn_once("Please test this program with IPv6 enabled kernel\n");
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto out;
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
- /* For CONFIG_IPV6=n, ipv6_bpf_stub is NULL which is
- * handled by the above if statement.
- */
dst_hold(&net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst);
skb_dst_set(skb, &net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst);
#endif
--
2.52.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: test_run: Remove ipv6_bpf_stub usage
2026-03-23 22:52 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: test_run: Remove ipv6_bpf_stub usage Martin KaFai Lau
@ 2026-03-24 2:16 ` sun jian
2026-03-24 9:55 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-24 15:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sun jian @ 2026-03-24 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin KaFai Lau
Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann, netdev,
Jakub Kicinski, Fernando Fernandez Mancera
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 6:58 AM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
>
> bpf_prog_test_run_skb() uses net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry for
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT test runs.
>
> It currently checks ipv6_bpf_stub before using ip6_null_entry.
> ipv6_bpf_stub will be removed by the CONFIG_IPV6=m support removal
> series posted at [1], so switch this check to ipv6_mod_enabled()
> instead.
>
> This change depends on that series [1]. Without it, CONFIG_IPV6=m is
> still possible, and net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry remains NULL until
> the IPv6 module is loaded.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260320185649.5411-1-fmancera@suse.de/
>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> ---
> net/bpf/test_run.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index 56bc8dc1e281..fb25184ed03b 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -1157,15 +1157,12 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
> }
>
> if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT) {
> - if (!ipv6_bpf_stub) {
> - pr_warn_once("Please test this program with the IPv6 module loaded\n");
> + if (!ipv6_mod_enabled()) {
> + pr_warn_once("Please test this program with IPv6 enabled kernel\n");
> ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> goto out;
> }
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> - /* For CONFIG_IPV6=n, ipv6_bpf_stub is NULL which is
> - * handled by the above if statement.
> - */
> dst_hold(&net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst);
> skb_dst_set(skb, &net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst);
> #endif
> --
> 2.52.0
>
>
Since the CONFIG_IPV6=m removal series also removes the stubs, switching
the check to ipv6_mod_enabled() makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: test_run: Remove ipv6_bpf_stub usage
2026-03-23 22:52 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: test_run: Remove ipv6_bpf_stub usage Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-24 2:16 ` sun jian
@ 2026-03-24 9:55 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-24 15:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Fernandez Mancera @ 2026-03-24 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin KaFai Lau, bpf
Cc: 'Alexei Starovoitov ', 'Andrii Nakryiko ',
'Daniel Borkmann ', netdev, Jakub Kicinski
On 3/23/26 11:52 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
>
> bpf_prog_test_run_skb() uses net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry for
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT test runs.
>
> It currently checks ipv6_bpf_stub before using ip6_null_entry.
> ipv6_bpf_stub will be removed by the CONFIG_IPV6=m support removal
> series posted at [1], so switch this check to ipv6_mod_enabled()
> instead.
>
> This change depends on that series [1]. Without it, CONFIG_IPV6=m is
> still possible, and net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry remains NULL until
> the IPv6 module is loaded.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260320185649.5411-1-fmancera@suse.de/
>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> ---
LGTM!
Reviewed-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: test_run: Remove ipv6_bpf_stub usage
2026-03-23 22:52 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: test_run: Remove ipv6_bpf_stub usage Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-24 2:16 ` sun jian
2026-03-24 9:55 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
@ 2026-03-24 15:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-03-24 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin KaFai Lau; +Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, netdev, kuba, fmancera
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 15:52:50 -0700 you wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
>
> bpf_prog_test_run_skb() uses net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry for
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT test runs.
>
> It currently checks ipv6_bpf_stub before using ip6_null_entry.
> ipv6_bpf_stub will be removed by the CONFIG_IPV6=m support removal
> series posted at [1], so switch this check to ipv6_mod_enabled()
> instead.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] bpf: test_run: Remove ipv6_bpf_stub usage
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/280de43e88c0
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-24 15:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-23 22:52 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: test_run: Remove ipv6_bpf_stub usage Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-24 2:16 ` sun jian
2026-03-24 9:55 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-24 15:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox