From: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: ethernet: validate pause autoneg setting
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:09:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08316b1f-a88f-1eb5-5ab2-06c23900cae7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200513134925.GE499265@lunn.ch>
On 5/13/2020 6:49 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> So, I think consistency of implementation is more important than fixing
>> this; the current behaviour has been established for many years now.
>
> Hi Russell, Doug
>
> With netlink ethtool we have the possibility of adding a new API to
> control this. And we can leave the IOCTL API alone, and the current
> ethtool commands. We can add a new command to ethtool which uses the new API.
>
> Question is, do we want to do this? Would we be introducing yet more
> confusion, rather than making the situation better?
>
> Andrew
>
I think it is likely to introduce more confusion.
-Doug
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-12 0:24 [PATCH net-next 0/4] Extend phylib implementation of pause support Doug Berger
2020-05-12 0:24 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: ethernet: validate pause autoneg setting Doug Berger
2020-05-12 0:47 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-12 18:31 ` Doug Berger
2020-05-12 18:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-12 18:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-13 3:48 ` Doug Berger
2020-05-13 5:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-13 9:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-13 13:49 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-13 14:59 ` Michal Kubecek
2020-05-13 17:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-13 22:09 ` Doug Berger [this message]
2020-05-13 21:31 ` Doug Berger
2020-05-13 21:27 ` Doug Berger
2020-05-12 19:08 ` Michal Kubecek
2020-05-13 2:37 ` Doug Berger
2020-05-12 3:16 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-05-12 0:24 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: add autoneg parameter to linkmode_set_pause Doug Berger
2020-05-12 0:24 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: ethernet: introduce phy_set_pause Doug Berger
2020-05-12 0:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-12 18:46 ` Doug Berger
2020-05-12 3:22 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-05-13 9:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-13 21:39 ` Doug Berger
2020-05-12 0:24 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: bcmgenet: add support for ethtool flow control Doug Berger
2020-05-12 3:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-05-13 9:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-13 22:00 ` Doug Berger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08316b1f-a88f-1eb5-5ab2-06c23900cae7@gmail.com \
--to=opendmb@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).