From: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@gmail.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v3 8/8] iplink: Reduce number of arguments to iplink_parse()
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:38:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0834a77a-4b9c-d132-990b-f0afb92768fb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4df74e2b-7248-1b48-3b2b-0ca2b10ea7de@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1565 bytes --]
David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/26/18 11:20 AM, Serhey Popovych wrote:
>> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:02:06 +0200
>>> Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +struct iplink_parse_args {
>>>> + const char *dev;
>>>> + const char *name;
>>>> + const char *type;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* This definitely must be the last one and initialized
>>>> + * by the caller of iplink_parse() that will initialize rest.
>>>> + */
>>>> + struct iplink_req *req;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>
>>> No control block please.
>> Accepted.
>>
>>> If you have too many arguments, then that means you need to do
>>> some refactoring.
>>
>> So using structure as single argument to a function isn't an option?
>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> As I mentioned before, iplink_parse should not be used by vxcan or veth
> as they only want a subset of the parsing. Once you take those users
> out, iplink_parse becomes local to iplink.c with a single user. In which
> case I suspect the compiler will always inline the function so no
> refactoring on the number of arguments is needed.
>
I will implement cut down function to parse vxcan and veth peer device
parameters and reuse it in iplink_parse() to avoid code duplications.
But my final goal not to refactor on number of arguments to parse,
that's side product of this series, I want to take @name, @dev and
other parameters for later use. In ->parse_opt() modules @name, @dev
and others are not available easily. It seems only way to get them is
to parse supplied netlink buffer.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-26 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-22 13:01 [PATCH iproute2-next v3 0/8] iplink: Improve iplink_parse() Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:01 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 1/8] utils: Introduce and use nodev() helper routine Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 2/8] iplink: Correctly report error when network device isn't found Serhey Popovych
2018-02-23 23:41 ` David Ahern
2018-02-25 12:07 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 3/8] iplink: Use "dev" and "name" parameters interchangeable when possible Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 4/8] iplink: Follow documented behaviour when "index" is given Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 5/8] veth,vxcan: Save/reinitialize/restore whole @struct ifinfomsg Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 3:28 ` David Ahern
2018-02-26 15:48 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 15:57 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 6/8] iplink: Perform most of request buffer setups and checks in iplink_parse() Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 3:31 ` David Ahern
2018-02-26 15:51 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 7/8] iplink: Move data structures to block of their users Serhey Popovych
2018-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH iproute2-next v3 8/8] iplink: Reduce number of arguments to iplink_parse() Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 3:35 ` David Ahern
2018-02-26 15:44 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 16:07 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 18:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-02-26 18:20 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 18:27 ` David Ahern
2018-02-26 18:38 ` Serhey Popovych [this message]
2018-02-26 20:09 ` Serhey Popovych
2018-02-26 21:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0834a77a-4b9c-d132-990b-f0afb92768fb@gmail.com \
--to=serhe.popovych@gmail.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).