From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>,
<przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>, <karol.kolacinski@intel.com>,
<richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
Samuel Salin <Samuel.salin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/10] idpf: add initial PTP support
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 14:05:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08a7931e-3374-44e7-971a-e8e2a876eb9e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250325054421.7e60e5ad@kernel.org>
On 3/25/2025 5:44 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:13:16 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote:
>> From: Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>
>>
>> PTP feature is supported if the VIRTCHNL2_CAP_PTP is negotiated during the
>> capabilities recognition. Initial PTP support includes PTP initialization
>> and registration of the clock.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
>> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>> Tested-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>
>> Tested-by: Samuel Salin <Samuel.salin@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
>
> Would be great to see a review tag from Jake on these :(
>
I saw these go by on IWL, and did give some comments. However, I didn't
have the time to do a proper review so I didn't tag them.
I'm happy to look these over and review them before the submission next
cycle :)
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK)
>> +int idpf_ptp_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
>> +void idpf_ptp_release(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
>> +#else /* CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK */
>> +static inline int idpf_ptp_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void idpf_ptp_release(struct idpf_adapter *adapter) { }
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK */
>> +#endif /* _IDPF_PTP_H */
>
> You add an unusual number of ifdefs for CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK.
> Is this really necessary? What breaks if 1588 is not enabled?
>
This style of converting the init and release to no-op is fairly common
in Intel drivers. I don't know about other places, but I think the
init/release is good since it just makes us disable the PTP
functionality when not supported.
We should make sure to try and limit these checks to the idpf_ptp.h
header file in one place, and make everything transparently disable if
the kernel lacks the PTP support :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 16:13 [PATCH net-next 00/10][pull request] idpf: add initial PTP support Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] " Tony Nguyen
2025-03-25 12:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 21:05 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2025-04-02 13:16 ` Olech, Milena
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] virtchnl: add PTP virtchnl definitions Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] idpf: move virtchnl structures to the header file Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] idpf: negotiate PTP capabilities and get PTP clock Tony Nguyen
2025-03-25 12:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 21:07 ` Jacob Keller
2025-03-26 8:24 ` Przemek Kitszel
2025-04-02 15:23 ` Olech, Milena
2025-04-02 16:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] idpf: add mailbox access to read PTP clock time Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] idpf: add PTP clock configuration Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] idpf: add Tx timestamp capabilities negotiation Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] idpf: add Tx timestamp flows Tony Nguyen
2025-03-25 13:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 21:10 ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-02 14:57 ` Olech, Milena
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] idpf: add support for Rx timestamping Tony Nguyen
2025-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] idpf: change the method for mailbox workqueue allocation Tony Nguyen
2025-03-25 21:08 ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-02 13:22 ` Olech, Milena
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08a7931e-3374-44e7-971a-e8e2a876eb9e@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=Samuel.salin@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=karol.kolacinski@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).