netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of_mdio: Fix broken PHY IRQ in case of probe deferral
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 15:21:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <08a89dd5-b707-8b8f-b8e1-e20b9ed630b7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV+jfh=EGt3SvjtrtVfWQ6P8ofp_JxeQZjRrSEfDWs5hA@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/18/2017 01:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
>>>> This most certainly works fine in the simple case where you have one PHY
>>>> hanging off the MDIO bus, now what happens if you have several?
>>>>
>>>> Presumably, the first PHY that returns EPROBE_DEFER will make the entire
>>>> bus registration return EPROB_DEFER as well, and so on, and so forth,
>>>> but I am not sure if we will be properly unwinding the successful
>>>> registration of PHYs that either don't have an interrupt, or did not
>>>> return EPROBE_DEFER.
>>>>
>>>> It should be possible to mimic this behavior by using the fixed PHY, and
>>>> possibly the dsa_loop.c driver which would create 4 ports, expecting 4
>>>> fixed PHYs to be present.
>>>
>>> mdiobus_unregister(), called from of_mdiobus_register() on failure,
>>> should do the unwinding, right?
>>>
>>> And when the driver is reprobed, all PHYs are reprobed, until they all
>>> succeed.
>>
>> That is the theory. I looked at that while reviewing the patch. But
>> this has probably not been tested in anger. It would be good to test
>> this properly, with not just the first PHY returning -EPROBE_DEFER, to
>> really test the unwind.
> 
> Unfortunately I don't have a board with multiple PHYs, so I cannot test
> that case.
> 
> Does unbinding/rebinding a network driver with multiple PHYs currently
> work? Or module unload/reload?

Usually there is a strict 1:1 mapping between a network device (not
driver) and a PHY device, switch drivers however, would have multiple
PHYs (one per port, aka net_deice).

NB: binding and unbinding of PHYs is pretty broken at the moment though,
because there is a complete disconnect between what the Ethernet MAC
expects, and the state in which the PHY is. I had some patches to fix
that, but this turned out to be playing whack-a-mole which I typically
suck at.
-- 
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-18 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-18 12:59 [PATCH] of_mdio: Fix broken PHY IRQ in case of probe deferral Geert Uytterhoeven
     [not found] ` <1495112345-24795-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-18 15:21   ` David Miller
2017-05-18 16:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-05-18 16:13   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
     [not found]     ` <CAMuHMdW_ZSn_nXSNRTHQwFioRD5UTotxKgm1eMqAP06n+cWv+g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-18 16:33       ` Andrew Lunn
2017-05-18 17:38         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-18 18:25 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-05-18 18:48   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-18 19:34     ` Andrew Lunn
2017-05-18 20:36       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-18 22:21         ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
     [not found]           ` <08a89dd5-b707-8b8f-b8e1-e20b9ed630b7-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-23  9:36             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-06-06  9:43               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
     [not found]                 ` <CAMuHMdUt6yOQ9=02z_7WG58YGxFYD=_zn7SeLEqGmfTrNBFJXw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-02 20:37                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-07-09 16:49                     ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-09 17:28                       ` Andrew Lunn
2017-07-09 19:38                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=08a89dd5-b707-8b8f-b8e1-e20b9ed630b7@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).