public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>, ast@kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	 andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, 	john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
		jolsa@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, 	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,  bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf, x86: inline bpf_get_current_task() for x86_64
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2026 09:45:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <08ab237ad7da8d1f6494cb434d9a5a46a599462c.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260104131635.27621-2-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>

On Sun, 2026-01-04 at 21:16 +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
> Inline bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() for x86_64
> to obtain better performance. The instruction we use here is:
> 
>   65 48 8B 04 25 [offset] // mov rax, gs:[offset]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> v2:
> - check the variable type in emit_ldx_percpu_r0 with __verify_pcpu_ptr
> - remove the usage of const_current_task
> ---
>  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index e3b1c4b1d550..f5ff7c77aad7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -1300,6 +1300,25 @@ static void emit_st_r12(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, int off, int imm)
>  	emit_st_index(pprog, size, dst_reg, X86_REG_R12, off, imm);
>  }
>  
> +static void __emit_ldx_percpu_r0(u8 **pprog, __force unsigned long ptr)
> +{
> +	u8 *prog = *pprog;
> +
> +	/* mov rax, gs:[ptr] */
> +	EMIT2(0x65, 0x48);
> +	EMIT2(0x8B, 0x04);
> +	EMIT1(0x25);
> +	EMIT((u32)ptr, 4);
> +
> +	*pprog = prog;
> +}
> +
> +#define emit_ldx_percpu_r0(prog, variable)					\
> +	do {									\
> +		__verify_pcpu_ptr(&(variable));					\
> +		__emit_ldx_percpu_r0(&prog, (__force unsigned long)&(variable));\
> +	} while (0)
> +
>  static int emit_atomic_rmw(u8 **pprog, u32 atomic_op,
>  			   u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, s16 off, u8 bpf_size)
>  {
> @@ -2441,6 +2460,12 @@ st:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
>  		case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL: {
>  			u8 *ip = image + addrs[i - 1];
>  
> +			if (insn->src_reg == 0 && (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_current_task ||
> +						   insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_current_task_btf)) {

I think this should be guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP).
The current.h:get_current() used
arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:this_cpu_read_stable() that is unrolled
to __raw_cpu_read_stable(), which uses __force_percpu_arg(), which uses
__force_percpu_prefix, which is defined differently depending on CONFIG_SMP.

> +				emit_ldx_percpu_r0(prog, current_task);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
>  			func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
>  			if (src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL && tail_call_reachable) {
>  				LOAD_TAIL_CALL_CNT_PTR(stack_depth);
> @@ -4082,3 +4107,14 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_timed_may_goto(void)
>  {
>  	return true;
>  }
> +
> +bool bpf_jit_inlines_helper_call(s32 imm)
> +{
> +	switch (imm) {
> +	case BPF_FUNC_get_current_task:
> +	case BPF_FUNC_get_current_task_btf:
> +		return true;
> +	default:
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +}

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-05 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-04 13:16 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf, x86: inline bpf_get_current_task() for x86_64 Menglong Dong
2026-01-04 13:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] " Menglong Dong
2026-01-05 17:45   ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-01-06  1:57     ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-05 18:04   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-06  1:52     ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-04 13:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: test the jited inline of bpf_get_current_task Menglong Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=08ab237ad7da8d1f6494cb434d9a5a46a599462c.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox