From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>, ast@kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf, x86: inline bpf_get_current_task() for x86_64
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2026 09:45:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08ab237ad7da8d1f6494cb434d9a5a46a599462c.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260104131635.27621-2-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
On Sun, 2026-01-04 at 21:16 +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
> Inline bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() for x86_64
> to obtain better performance. The instruction we use here is:
>
> 65 48 8B 04 25 [offset] // mov rax, gs:[offset]
>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> v2:
> - check the variable type in emit_ldx_percpu_r0 with __verify_pcpu_ptr
> - remove the usage of const_current_task
> ---
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index e3b1c4b1d550..f5ff7c77aad7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -1300,6 +1300,25 @@ static void emit_st_r12(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, int off, int imm)
> emit_st_index(pprog, size, dst_reg, X86_REG_R12, off, imm);
> }
>
> +static void __emit_ldx_percpu_r0(u8 **pprog, __force unsigned long ptr)
> +{
> + u8 *prog = *pprog;
> +
> + /* mov rax, gs:[ptr] */
> + EMIT2(0x65, 0x48);
> + EMIT2(0x8B, 0x04);
> + EMIT1(0x25);
> + EMIT((u32)ptr, 4);
> +
> + *pprog = prog;
> +}
> +
> +#define emit_ldx_percpu_r0(prog, variable) \
> + do { \
> + __verify_pcpu_ptr(&(variable)); \
> + __emit_ldx_percpu_r0(&prog, (__force unsigned long)&(variable));\
> + } while (0)
> +
> static int emit_atomic_rmw(u8 **pprog, u32 atomic_op,
> u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, s16 off, u8 bpf_size)
> {
> @@ -2441,6 +2460,12 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
> case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL: {
> u8 *ip = image + addrs[i - 1];
>
> + if (insn->src_reg == 0 && (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_current_task ||
> + insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_current_task_btf)) {
I think this should be guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP).
The current.h:get_current() used
arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:this_cpu_read_stable() that is unrolled
to __raw_cpu_read_stable(), which uses __force_percpu_arg(), which uses
__force_percpu_prefix, which is defined differently depending on CONFIG_SMP.
> + emit_ldx_percpu_r0(prog, current_task);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
> if (src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL && tail_call_reachable) {
> LOAD_TAIL_CALL_CNT_PTR(stack_depth);
> @@ -4082,3 +4107,14 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_timed_may_goto(void)
> {
> return true;
> }
> +
> +bool bpf_jit_inlines_helper_call(s32 imm)
> +{
> + switch (imm) {
> + case BPF_FUNC_get_current_task:
> + case BPF_FUNC_get_current_task_btf:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-05 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-04 13:16 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf, x86: inline bpf_get_current_task() for x86_64 Menglong Dong
2026-01-04 13:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] " Menglong Dong
2026-01-05 17:45 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-01-06 1:57 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-05 18:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-06 1:52 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-04 13:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: test the jited inline of bpf_get_current_task Menglong Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08ab237ad7da8d1f6494cb434d9a5a46a599462c.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox