Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jiawen Wu" <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
To: "'Andrew Lunn'" <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Mengyuan Lou'" <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>,
	"'Andrew Lunn'" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"'David S. Miller'" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"'Eric Dumazet'" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"'Jakub Kicinski'" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"'Paolo Abeni'" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"'Russell King'" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"'Simon Horman'" <horms@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Mengyuan Lou'" <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>,
	"'Andrew Lunn'" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"'David S. Miller'" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"'Eric Dumazet'" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"'Jakub Kicinski'" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"'Paolo Abeni'" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"'Russell King'" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"'Simon Horman'" <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] net: txgbe: fix module identification
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 11:19:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <095b01dcf307$c8af8920$5a0e9b60$@trustnetic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9945fe19-815b-4e27-8446-c21cdfaa16d9@lunn.ch>

On Tue, Jun 2, 2026 9:15 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 10:54:43AM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > For AML devices, there are some issues where the wrong module
> > indentified then configure PHY failed.
> >
> > The module info buffers should be initialized to 0 before the firmware
> > returns information. And DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE_MASK() does not guarantee
> > zeroed contents, so explicitly clear the temporary interface masks before
> > setting supported interfaces.
> >
> > Rework txgbe_identify_module() to validate module identifiers through
> > explicit type checks instead of relying on transceiver_type heuristics.
> > When using the SFP module, transceiver_type could be a random value,
> > because it was read from an invalid register.
> 
> This seems like multiple fixes. Please break the patch up.

OK.

> The current DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE_MASK() is not great. It is mostly
> used by phylink in structures which get allocated and zeroed. But here
> you have it as a stack variable. Maybe we want a new variant which
> includes = {} ?

I'll change it to:
  unsigned long interfaces[PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MAX] = {};

If PHYLINK could optimize DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE_MASK(), it would be better.



      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-03  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-02  2:54 [PATCH net] net: txgbe: fix module identification Jiawen Wu
2026-06-02 13:14 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-03  3:19   ` Jiawen Wu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='095b01dcf307$c8af8920$5a0e9b60$@trustnetic.com' \
    --to=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mengyuanlou@net-swift.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox