netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 4.12-RC2 BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/47-iwlwifi
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 09:19:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <09ddb018-7093-2e2a-c84b-148889f7f06d@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495487095.26008.7.camel@sipsolutions.net>

On 22-5-2017 23:04, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi Arend,
> 
> Sorry, I forgot that the original message wasn't Cc'ed to the wireless
> list, only netdev.

That explains. Not subscribed to that.

>> +++ b/net/wireless/scan.c
>> @@ -322,9 +322,7 @@ static void cfg80211_del_sched_scan_req(struct
>> cfg80211_regi
>>  {
>>         struct cfg80211_sched_scan_request *pos;
>>
>> -       ASSERT_RTNL();
>> -
>> -       list_for_each_entry(pos, &rdev->sched_scan_req_list, list) {
>> +       list_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, &rdev->sched_scan_req_list,
>> list) {
> 
> [snip]
> 
> This looks fine, but perhaps in the above we should have some kind of
> locking assertion, e.g.
> 
> 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());

Thought about something like this after sending the email. So there are
two call sites. One for scheduled scan results notification and one in
scheduled scan stop scenario. So for the latter it is not needed to use
the rcu_read_lock() as it should have RTNL lock hence the two checks above?

Will create a formal patch.

Regards,
Arend

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-23  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-22 10:36 4.12-RC2 BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/47-iwlwifi Sander Eikelenboom
     [not found] ` <a54f3f4f-2365-2154-ad18-82e4cd572aac-6SM94LqRVpn6gRhOQ7JHfg@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-22 10:57   ` Johannes Berg
2017-05-22 12:09     ` Arend van Spriel
     [not found]       ` <764a929c-ce8a-c859-a49e-2f20cb05ae44-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-22 21:02         ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-05-22 21:04           ` Johannes Berg
2017-05-23  7:19             ` Arend Van Spriel [this message]
2017-05-23  7:22               ` Johannes Berg
     [not found]                 ` <1495524153.2464.2.camel-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-23  7:24                   ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-05-23 17:51           ` Sander Eikelenboom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=09ddb018-7093-2e2a-c84b-148889f7f06d@broadcom.com \
    --to=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).