public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
To: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <panchamukhi@arista.com>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: expose gc_scan_interval_max via sysctl
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 13:15:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <09e1535f-59fe-41eb-91ed-2aeb97957bfc@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311194058.13860-1-panchamukhi@arista.com>

On 3/11/26 8:40 PM, Prasanna S Panchamukhi wrote:
> The conntrack garbage collection worker uses an adaptive algorithm that
> adjusts the scan interval based on the average timeout of tracked
> entries.  The upper bound of this interval is hardcoded as
> GC_SCAN_INTERVAL_MAX (60 seconds).
> 
> Expose the upper bound as a new sysctl,
> net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_gc_scan_interval_max, so it can be tuned at
> runtime without rebuilding the kernel.  The default remains 60 seconds
> to preserve existing behavior.  The sysctl is global and read-only in
> non-init network namespaces, consistent with nf_conntrack_max and
> nf_conntrack_buckets.
> 
> In environments where long-lived offloaded flows dominate the table,
> the adaptive average drifts toward the maximum, delaying cleanup
> of short-lived expired entries such as those in TCP CLOSE state
> (10s timeout). Adding sysctl to set the maximum GC scan helps to
> tune according to the evironment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <panchamukhi@arista.com>
[...]
> ---
>   Documentation/networking/nf_conntrack-sysctl.rst | 11 +++++++++++
>   include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h             |  1 +
>   net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c                |  9 ++++++---
>   net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c          | 10 ++++++++++
>   4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/nf_conntrack-sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/nf_conntrack-sysctl.rst
> index 35f889259fcd..c848eef9bc4f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/nf_conntrack-sysctl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/nf_conntrack-sysctl.rst
> @@ -64,6 +64,17 @@ nf_conntrack_frag6_timeout - INTEGER (seconds)
>   
>   	Time to keep an IPv6 fragment in memory.
>   
> +nf_conntrack_gc_scan_interval_max - INTEGER (seconds)
> +	default 60
> +
> +	Maximum interval between garbage collection scans of the connection
> +	tracking table. The GC worker uses an adaptive algorithm that adjusts
> +	the scan interval based on average entry timeouts; this parameter caps
> +	the upper bound. Lower values cause expired entries (e.g. connections
> +	in CLOSE state) to be cleaned up faster, at the cost of slightly more
> +	CPU usage. Minimum value is 1.
> +	This sysctl is only writeable in the initial net namespace.
> +

I think it would be a good idea to add under which situations it is good 
to tweak this setting.

>   nf_conntrack_generic_timeout - INTEGER (seconds)
>   	default 600
>   
> diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
> index bc42dd0e10e6..0449577f322e 100644
> --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
> +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ extern struct hlist_nulls_head *nf_conntrack_hash;
>   extern unsigned int nf_conntrack_htable_size;
>   extern seqcount_spinlock_t nf_conntrack_generation;
>   extern unsigned int nf_conntrack_max;
> +extern unsigned int nf_conntrack_gc_scan_interval_max;
>

Could it be just int? so there is no need to cast it to s32 later?

>   /* must be called with rcu read lock held */
>   static inline void
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> index 27ce5fda8993..54949246f329 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(nf_conntrack_mutex);
>    * allowing non-idle machines to wakeup more often when needed.
>    */
>   #define GC_SCAN_INITIAL_COUNT	100
> -#define GC_SCAN_INTERVAL_INIT	GC_SCAN_INTERVAL_MAX
> +#define GC_SCAN_INTERVAL_INIT	nf_conntrack_gc_scan_interval_max
>   
>   #define GC_SCAN_MAX_DURATION	msecs_to_jiffies(10)
>   #define GC_SCAN_EXPIRED_MAX	(64000u / HZ)
> @@ -204,6 +204,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_htable_size);
>   
>   unsigned int nf_conntrack_max __read_mostly;
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_max);
> +
> +unsigned int nf_conntrack_gc_scan_interval_max __read_mostly = GC_SCAN_INTERVAL_MAX;
> +
>   seqcount_spinlock_t nf_conntrack_generation __read_mostly;
>   static siphash_aligned_key_t nf_conntrack_hash_rnd;
>   
> @@ -1568,7 +1571,7 @@ static void gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>   				delta_time = nfct_time_stamp - gc_work->start_time;
>   
>   				/* re-sched immediately if total cycle time is exceeded */
> -				next_run = delta_time < (s32)GC_SCAN_INTERVAL_MAX;
> +				next_run = delta_time < (s32)nf_conntrack_gc_scan_interval_max;
>   				goto early_exit;
>   			}
>   

READ_ONCE() is required IMHO as it can be modified from sysctl concurrently.

> @@ -1630,7 +1633,7 @@ static void gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>   
>   	gc_work->next_bucket = 0;
>   
> -	next_run = clamp(next_run, GC_SCAN_INTERVAL_MIN, GC_SCAN_INTERVAL_MAX);
> +	next_run = clamp(next_run, GC_SCAN_INTERVAL_MIN, nf_conntrack_gc_scan_interval_max);
>   

Likewise here, READ_ONCE() recommended..

Thanks,
Fernando.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-12 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-11 19:40 [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: expose gc_scan_interval_max via sysctl Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2026-03-12 12:12 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-12 12:15 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera [this message]
2026-03-12 21:44   ` Prasanna Panchamukhi
2026-03-12 12:36 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-12 22:31   ` Prasanna Panchamukhi
2026-03-12 22:42     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-12 23:10     ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=09e1535f-59fe-41eb-91ed-2aeb97957bfc@suse.de \
    --to=fmancera@suse.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=panchamukhi@arista.com \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox