From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] net: qrtr: ns: Fix use-after-free in driver remove()
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 17:33:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ab00cb4-8335-472d-b43e-3bbd99b41480@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403-qrtr-fix-v2-5-f88a14859c63@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 4/3/26 6:06 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> In the remove callback, if a packet arrives after destroy_workqueue() is
> called, but before sock_release(), the qrtr_ns_data_ready() callback will
> try to queue the work, causing use-after-free issue.
>
> Fix this issue by saving the default 'sk_data_ready' callback during
> qrtr_ns_init() and use it to replace the qrtr_ns_data_ready() callback at
> the start of remove(). This ensures that even if a packet arrives after
> destroy_workqueue(), the work struct will not be dereferenced.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 0c2204a4ad71 ("net: qrtr: Migrate nameservice to kernel from userspace")
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> net/qrtr/ns.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/qrtr/ns.c b/net/qrtr/ns.c
> index dfb5dad9473c..c62d79e03d64 100644
> --- a/net/qrtr/ns.c
> +++ b/net/qrtr/ns.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ static struct {
> u32 lookup_count;
> struct workqueue_struct *workqueue;
> struct work_struct work;
> + void (*saved_data_ready)(struct sock *sk);
> int local_node;
> } qrtr_ns;
>
> @@ -754,6 +755,7 @@ int qrtr_ns_init(void)
> goto err_sock;
> }
>
> + qrtr_ns.saved_data_ready = qrtr_ns.sock->sk->sk_data_ready;
> qrtr_ns.sock->sk->sk_data_ready = qrtr_ns_data_ready;
>
> sq.sq_port = QRTR_PORT_CTRL;
> @@ -803,6 +805,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qrtr_ns_init);
>
> void qrtr_ns_remove(void)
> {
> + write_lock_bh(&qrtr_ns.sock->sk->sk_callback_lock);
> + qrtr_ns.sock->sk->sk_data_ready = qrtr_ns.saved_data_ready;
> + write_unlock_bh(&qrtr_ns.sock->sk->sk_callback_lock);
Sashiko says:
---
Does this lock adequately protect against concurrent callback execution?
In the network receive path, __sock_queue_rcv_skb() typically evaluates
!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) and invokes sk->sk_data_ready() locklessly,
without acquiring sk_callback_lock or being in an RCU read-side
critical section.
If a thread processing a packet fetches the qrtr_ns_data_ready pointer
and is preempted, could it resume and execute the callback after
qrtr_ns_remove() has already finished destroying the workqueue?
---
There are more remarks from sashiko:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260403-qrtr-fix-v2-0-f88a14859c63%40oss.qualcomm.com
AFAICS they are pre-existing issues or false positive, but please have a
look.
/P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-03 16:06 [PATCH v2 0/5] net: qrtr: ns: A bunch of fixs Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-03 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] net: qrtr: ns: Limit the maximum server registration per node Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-03 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] net: qrtr: ns: Limit the maximum number of lookups Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-03 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] net: qrtr: ns: Free the node during ctrl_cmd_bye() Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-03 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] net: qrtr: ns: Limit the total number of nodes Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-03 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] net: qrtr: ns: Fix use-after-free in driver remove() Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-04-07 15:33 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-04-04 7:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] net: qrtr: ns: A bunch of fixs Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ab00cb4-8335-472d-b43e-3bbd99b41480@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox