From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:46:17 -0400 Message-ID: <0bd1e885-cdf3-60fc-783b-a075b777560b@mojatatu.com> References: <1492346070-6002-1-git-send-email-jhs@emojatatu.com> <20170417081936.GA1892@nanopsycho.orion> <1492434659.10587.90.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <20170417153133.GA1895@nanopsycho.orion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com To: Jiri Pirko , Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:34588 "EHLO mail-io0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754786AbdDQQqT (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:46:19 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f178.google.com with SMTP id a103so159780108ioj.1 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:46:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170417153133.GA1895@nanopsycho.orion> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 17-04-17 11:31 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:10:59PM CEST, eric.dumazet@gmail.com wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 07:01 -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > Agreed. > > Plus the argument that attributes are "a big waste" sounds to me really > silly. What is couple of bytes?Please do this properly, as it should > be done. Jiri - you wanted to have these uapi discussions, right? ;-> Of course it is trivial to add this as attributes and 32 bits for this case is not a big deal because it is done once. I want to talk about the pads instead ;-> What do you suggest we do with pads? cheers, jaaml