From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Koichiro Den <den@klaipeden.com>, mst@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost-net: revert vhost_exceeds_maxpend logic to its original
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:06:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0cbc33d6-eb1e-cea4-4cdf-a8a88932da62@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170819064129.27272-1-den@klaipeden.com>
On 2017年08月19日 14:41, Koichiro Den wrote:
> To depend on vq.num and the usage of VHOST_MAX_PEND is not succinct
> and in some case unexpected, so revert its logic part only.
Hi:
Could you explain a little bit more on the case that is was not sufficent?
Thanks
>
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@klaipeden.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index 06d044862e58..99cf99b308a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -433,11 +433,15 @@ static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
>
> static bool vhost_exceeds_maxpend(struct vhost_net *net)
> {
> + int num_pends;
> struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
>
> - return (nvq->upend_idx + vq->num - VHOST_MAX_PEND) % UIO_MAXIOV
> - == nvq->done_idx;
> + num_pends = likely(nvq->upend_idx >= nvq->done_idx) ?
> + (nvq->upend_idx - nvq->done_idx) :
> + (nvq->upend_idx + UIO_MAXIOV - nvq->done_idx);
> +
> + return num_pends > VHOST_MAX_PEND;
> }
>
> /* Expects to be always run from workqueue - which acts as
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-21 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-19 6:41 [PATCH 2/2] vhost-net: revert vhost_exceeds_maxpend logic to its original Koichiro Den
2017-08-21 3:06 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2017-08-21 12:40 ` Jason Wang
2017-08-21 13:32 ` Koichiro Den
2017-08-21 13:30 ` Koichiro Den
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0cbc33d6-eb1e-cea4-4cdf-a8a88932da62@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=den@klaipeden.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).