From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>, <jmaloy@redhat.com>,
<ying.xue@windriver.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tipc: fix a potential deadlock on &tx->lock
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 11:29:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ce8658b-9b8a-923c-a5bd-c63284d2db96@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230927181414.59928-1-dg573847474@gmail.com>
On 9/27/2023 11:14 AM, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
> It seems that tipc_crypto_key_revoke() could be be invoked by
> wokequeue tipc_crypto_work_rx() under process context and
> timer/rx callback under softirq context, thus the lock acquisition
> on &tx->lock seems better use spin_lock_bh() to prevent possible
> deadlock.
>
> This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
> developing for irq-related deadlock.
>
Interesting.
> tipc_crypto_work_rx() <workqueue>
> --> tipc_crypto_key_distr()
> --> tipc_bcast_xmit()
> --> tipc_bcbase_xmit()
> --> tipc_bearer_bc_xmit()
> --> tipc_crypto_xmit()
> --> tipc_ehdr_build()
> --> tipc_crypto_key_revoke()
> --> spin_lock(&tx->lock)
> <timer interrupt>
> --> tipc_disc_timeout()
> --> tipc_bearer_xmit_skb()
> --> tipc_crypto_xmit()
> --> tipc_ehdr_build()
> --> tipc_crypto_key_revoke()
> --> spin_lock(&tx->lock) <deadlock here>
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> net/tipc/crypto.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c
> index 302fd749c424..43c3f1c971b8 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/crypto.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c
> @@ -1441,14 +1441,14 @@ static int tipc_crypto_key_revoke(struct net *net, u8 tx_key)
> struct tipc_crypto *tx = tipc_net(net)->crypto_tx;
> struct tipc_key key;
>
> - spin_lock(&tx->lock);
> + spin_lock_bh(&tx->lock);
> key = tx->key;
> WARN_ON(!key.active || tx_key != key.active);
>
> /* Free the active key */
> tipc_crypto_key_set_state(tx, key.passive, 0, key.pending);
> tipc_crypto_key_detach(tx->aead[key.active], &tx->lock);
> - spin_unlock(&tx->lock);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&tx->lock);
>
> pr_warn("%s: key is revoked\n", tx->name);
> return -EKEYREVOKED;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-29 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-27 18:14 [PATCH] tipc: fix a potential deadlock on &tx->lock Chengfeng Ye
2023-09-29 18:29 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2023-10-01 17:46 ` Simon Horman
2023-10-02 20:30 ` Jon Maloy
2023-10-03 6:29 ` Chengfeng Ye
2023-10-04 20:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ce8658b-9b8a-923c-a5bd-c63284d2db96@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dg573847474@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).