From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, mst@redhat.com,
maxime.coquelin@redhat.com,
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC (resend) net-next 0/6] virtio-net: Add support for virtio-net header extensions
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:01:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d9216af-e3db-e06b-f70d-d77f519c3fd4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492274298-17362-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com>
On 2017年04月16日 00:38, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
> Curreclty virtion net header is fixed size and adding things to it is rather
> difficult to do. This series attempt to add the infrastructure as well as some
> extensions that try to resolve some deficiencies we currently have.
>
> First, vnet header only has space for 16 flags. This may not be enough
> in the future. The extensions will provide space for 32 possbile extension
> flags and 32 possible extensions. These flags will be carried in the
> first pseudo extension header, the presense of which will be determined by
> the flag in the virtio net header.
>
> The extensions themselves will immidiately follow the extension header itself.
> They will be added to the packet in the same order as they appear in the
> extension flags. No padding is placed between the extensions and any
> extensions negotiated, but not used need by a given packet will convert to
> trailing padding.
Do we need a explicit padding (e.g an extension) which could be
controlled by each side?
>
> For example:
> | vnet mrg hdr | ext hdr | ext 1 | ext 2 | ext 5 | .. pad .. | packet data |
Just some rough thoughts:
- Is this better to use TLV instead of bitmap here? One advantage of TLV
is that the length is not limited by the length of bitmap.
- For 1.1, do we really want something like vnet header? AFAIK, it was
not used by modern NICs, is this better to pack all meta-data into
descriptor itself? This may need a some changes in tun/macvtap, but
looks more PCIE friendly.
Thanks
>
> Extensions proposed in this series are:
> - IPv6 fragment id extension
> * Currently, the guest generated fragment id is discarded and the host
> generates an IPv6 fragment id if the packet has to be fragmented. The
> code attempts to add time based perturbation to id generation to make
> it harder to guess the next fragment id to be used. However, doing this
> on the host may result is less perturbation (due to differnet timing)
> and might make id guessing easier. Ideally, the ids generated by the
> guest should be used. One could also argue that we a "violating" the
> IPv6 protocol in the if the _strict_ interpretation of the spec.
>
> - VLAN header acceleration
> * Currently virtio doesn't not do vlan header acceleration and instead
> uses software tagging. One of the first things that the host will do is
> strip the vlan header out. When passing the packet the a guest the
> vlan header is re-inserted in to the packet. We can skip all that work
> if we can pass the vlan data in accelearted format. Then the host will
> not do any extra work. However, so far, this yeilded a very small
> perf bump (only ~1%). I am still looking into this.
>
> - UDP tunnel offload
> * Similar to vlan acceleration, with this extension we can pass additional
> data to host for support GSO with udp tunnel and possible other
> encapsulations. This yeilds a significant perfromance improvement
> (still testing remote checksum code).
>
> An addition extension that is unfinished (due to still testing for any
> side-effects) is checksum passthrough to support drivers that set
> CHECKSUM_COMPLETE. This would eliminate the need for guests to compute
> the software checksum.
>
> This series only takes care of virtio net. I have addition patches for the
> host side (vhost and tap/macvtap as well as qemu), but wanted to get feedback
> on the general approach first.
>
> Vladislav Yasevich (6):
> virtio-net: Remove the use the padded vnet_header structure
> virtio-net: make header length handling uniform
> virtio_net: Add basic skeleton for handling vnet header extensions.
> virtio-net: Add support for IPv6 fragment id vnet header extension.
> virtio-net: Add support for vlan acceleration vnet header extension.
> virtio-net: Add support for UDP tunnel offload and extension.
>
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> include/linux/skbuff.h | 5 ++
> include/linux/virtio_net.h | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 38 ++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-15 16:38 [PATCH RFC (resend) net-next 0/6] virtio-net: Add support for virtio-net header extensions Vladislav Yasevich
2017-04-15 16:38 ` [PATCH RFC (resend) net-next 1/6] virtio-net: Remove the use the padded vnet_header structure Vladislav Yasevich
2017-04-15 16:38 ` [PATCH RFC (resend) net-next 2/6] virtio-net: make header length handling uniform Vladislav Yasevich
2017-04-15 16:38 ` [PATCH RFC (resend) net-next 3/6] virtio_net: Add basic skeleton for handling vnet header extensions Vladislav Yasevich
2017-04-18 2:52 ` Jason Wang
2017-04-15 16:38 ` [PATCH RFC (resend) net-next 4/6] virtio-net: Add support for IPv6 fragment id vnet header extension Vladislav Yasevich
2017-04-15 16:38 ` [PATCH RFC (resend) net-next 5/6] virtio-net: Add support for vlan acceleration " Vladislav Yasevich
2017-04-16 0:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-04-18 2:54 ` Jason Wang
2017-04-15 16:38 ` [PATCH RFC (resend) net-next 6/6] virtio: Add support for UDP tunnel offload and extension Vladislav Yasevich
2017-04-18 3:01 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2017-04-20 15:34 ` [PATCH RFC (resend) net-next 0/6] virtio-net: Add support for virtio-net header extensions Vlad Yasevich
2017-04-21 4:05 ` Jason Wang
2017-04-21 13:08 ` Vlad Yasevich
2017-04-24 3:22 ` Jason Wang
2017-04-24 17:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d9216af-e3db-e06b-f70d-d77f519c3fd4@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).