From: "Jiawen Wu" <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
To: "'Simon Horman'" <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>,
<andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<richardcochran@gmail.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
<aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>, <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
<michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>, <kees@kernel.org>,
<joe@dama.to>, <leitao@debian.org>, <shaojijie@huawei.com>,
<u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>, <weirongguang@kylinos.cn>,
<larysa.zaremba@intel.com>, <fabio.baltieri@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v10 4/5] net: wangxun: implement soft quiesce for PCIe error recovery
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 17:43:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e1d01dd1375$461c15d0$d2544170$@trustnetic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714091113.1815787-1-horms@kernel.org>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c
> > index c8a4822d38194..a65312c8078fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -3383,5 +3383,23 @@ void wx_service_timer(struct timer_list *t)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(wx_service_timer);
> >
> > +void wx_soft_quiesce(struct wx *wx)
> > +{
> > + if (!netif_running(wx->netdev) ||
> > + test_and_set_bit(WX_STATE_DOWN, wx->state))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + pci_clear_master(wx->pdev);
> > + netif_tx_stop_all_queues(wx->netdev);
> > + netif_carrier_off(wx->netdev);
> > + netif_tx_disable(wx->netdev);
> > + wx_napi_disable_all(wx);
> > + wx_ptp_quiesce(wx);
> > +
> > + clear_bit(WX_FLAG_NEED_PF_RESET, wx->flags);
> > + timer_delete_sync(&wx->service_timer);
>
> [Severity: High]
> The commit message notes the service task is deliberately not cancelled here
> to avoid delaying PCIe error recovery. However, does omitting
> cancel_work_sync(&wx->service_task) open a race window with the subtasks
> that rely on the WX_STATE_DOWN flag?
>
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(wx_soft_quiesce);
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_main.c
> > index a8773712cff82..a7bde03a98feb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_main.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -94,6 +94,10 @@ static void txgbe_module_detection_subtask(struct wx *wx)
> > {
> > int err;
> >
> > + if (test_bit(WX_STATE_DOWN, wx->state) ||
> > + test_bit(WX_STATE_RESETTING, wx->state))
> > + return;
> > +
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does this state check adequately protect against concurrent MMIO access
> during a PCIe reset?
>
> If the task passes this check, it subsequently sleeps for 200ms:
>
> txgbe_main.c:txgbe_module_detection_subtask() {
> ...
> if (!test_and_clear_bit(WX_FLAG_NEED_MODULE_RESET, wx->flags))
> return;
>
> /* wait for SFF module ready */
> msleep(200);
>
> err = txgbe_identify_module(wx);
> ...
> }
>
> If wx_soft_quiesce() runs on another CPU during this msleep(), it will set
> WX_STATE_DOWN and begin a hardware reset.
>
> When the task wakes up from the sleep, will it call txgbe_identify_module()
> and perform MMIO reads (such as rd32(wx, WX_GPIO_EXT)) while the device is
> in reset?
>
> Could this time-of-check to time-of-use race lead to Master Aborts or
> fatal PCIe errors during AER recovery?
>
> > if (!test_and_clear_bit(WX_FLAG_NEED_MODULE_RESET, wx->flags))
> > return;
>
This task is typically triggered during interface bring-up or optical module
insertion. It has a very low coincidence rate with the timing of pcie errors.
Nevertheless, as a defensive measure, I will add a re-check of WX_STATE_DOWN
immediately after the sleep returns.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 6:14 [PATCH net-next v10 0/5] net: wangxun: timeout and error Jiawen Wu
2026-07-07 6:14 ` [PATCH net-next v10 1/5] net: ngbe: implement libwx reset ops Jiawen Wu
2026-07-07 6:14 ` [PATCH net-next v10 2/5] net: wangxun: add Tx timeout process Jiawen Wu
2026-07-07 6:14 ` [PATCH net-next v10 3/5] net: wangxun: add reinit parameter to wx->do_reset callback Jiawen Wu
2026-07-07 6:14 ` [PATCH net-next v10 4/5] net: wangxun: implement soft quiesce for PCIe error recovery Jiawen Wu
2026-07-14 9:11 ` Simon Horman
2026-07-14 9:43 ` Jiawen Wu [this message]
2026-07-07 6:14 ` [PATCH net-next v10 5/5] net: wangxun: add pcie error handler Jiawen Wu
2026-07-14 9:11 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='0e1d01dd1375$461c15d0$d2544170$@trustnetic.com' \
--to=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fabio.baltieri@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=joe@dama.to \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mengyuanlou@net-swift.com \
--cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=shaojijie@huawei.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
--cc=weirongguang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox