Re: [PATCH 06/11] super: Use acquire for SB_BORN check in super_cache_count()

[Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>]

在 2026/8/31 20:29, Jan Kara 写道:
> On Tue 25-08-26 17:54:17, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> The active SB_BORN check in super_cache_count() pairs with the
>> smp_store_release() in super_wake() when publishing a newly initialized
>> superblock.
>>
>> Replace the historical independent smp_rmb() barrier with an acquire load
>> on sb->s_flags. This expresses the publish-subscribe pattern more clearly
>> and allows weakly-ordered architectures like arm64 to utilize efficient
>> native instructions (e.g., LDAR) instead of a full one-way barrier.
>>
>> Also update the outdated comment to correctly point to super_wake().
>>
>> Assisted-by: Gemini:Gemini-3.1
>> Assisted-by: DeepSeek:DeepSeek-V3
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> 
> Looks good. Just one nit below. With that addressed feel free to add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> 
>> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
>> index 05e443173038..5860daea6d40 100644
>> --- a/fs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/super.c
>> @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
>>  	 * However, if we are currently mounting the superblock, the underlying
>>  	 * filesystem might be in a state of partial construction and hence it
>>  	 * is dangerous to access it.  super_trylock_shared() uses a SB_BORN check
>> -	 * to avoid this situation, so do the same here. The memory barrier is
>> -	 * matched with the one in mount_fs() as we don't hold locks here.
>> +	 * to avoid this situation, so do the same here. The acquire is matched
>> +	 * with the smp_store_release() in super_wake() as we don't hold locks here.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (!(sb->s_flags & SB_BORN))
>> +	if (!(smp_load_acquire(&sb->s_flags) & SB_BORN))
>>  		return 0;
> 
> We have super_flags() helper exactly for checks like this so it would be
> good to use it here.

Right! And we can just remove the outdated memory barrier comment, as
the underlying super_flags() implementation already has a self-document.

> 
> 								Honza
> 
>> -	smp_rmb();
>>  
>>  	if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects &&
>>  	    super_fs_objects_eligible(sc))
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>