From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1 v1] rtnetlink: require unique netns identifier Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 19:09:55 -0700 Message-ID: <0e8a86e6-5948-1e91-d937-893eb62ceef1@gmail.com> References: <20180203132904.11972-1-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> <20180203132904.11972-2-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> <20180203111701.2ff8d7a3@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, jbenc@redhat.com, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net To: Stephen Hemminger , Christian Brauner Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180203111701.2ff8d7a3@xeon-e3> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 2/3/18 12:17 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:29:04 +0100 > Christian Brauner wrote: > >> +static int rtnl_ensure_unique_netns_attr(const struct sock *sk, >> + struct nlattr *tb[], >> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) >> +{ >> + int ret = -EINVAL; >> + struct net *net = NULL, *unique_net = NULL; >> + >> + /* Requests without network namespace ids have been able to specify >> + * multiple properties referring to different network namespaces so >> + * don't regress them. >> + */ >> + if (!tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID]) >> + return 0; >> + >> + if (!tb[IFLA_NET_NS_PID] && !tb[IFLA_NET_NS_FD]) >> + return 0; > > Isn't this an error? > >> + >> + unique_net = get_net_ns_by_id(sock_net(sk), nla_get_s32(tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID])); >> + if (!unique_net) >> + return -1; > > Other paths are returning errno, so why -1 here? > extack needs to be filled in too.