RE: [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] r8152: add helper functions for PHY OCP registers

[Chih Kai Hsu <hsu.chih.kai@realtek.com>]

On 31/03/26 10:02 am, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c index
> > 32a4e8d423115..8747c55e0a484 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> [ ... ]
> > +static void sram_write_w0w1(struct r8152 *tp, u16 addr, u16 clear,
> > +u16 set) {
> > +     u16 data;
> > +
> > +     data = sram_read(tp, addr);
> > +     data = (data & ~clear) | set;
> > +     ocp_reg_write(tp, OCP_SRAM_DATA, data);
> 
> AI flags:
> 
>   Does writing directly to OCP_SRAM_DATA here actually write to the
> intended
>   address?
Yes, this actually writes to the intended address.

> 
>   Because hardware indirect SRAM access ports typically auto-increment their
>   internal address pointer upon access, the sram_read() call will advance the
>   pointer. By writing directly to OCP_SRAM_DATA instead of using
>   sram_write(tp, addr, data) to re-establish the address, the updated value
>   would be written to the next address (addr + 1) rather than the original addr.
> 
>   Could this corrupt the PHY configuration memory across the initialization
> paths
>   that now use sram_clr_bits() and sram_set_bits()?
> 
> Can you confirm if this is legit? Not sure whether this device / register
> auto-increments or where AI got it from.
The address pointer, OCP_SRAM_ADDR, is not auto-incremented after sram_read(tp, addr).
However, the address pointer is incremented automatically after ocp_reg_write(tp, OCP_SRAM_DATA, data).

Best Regards,
Chih-Kai