From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Josefsson Subject: Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19 Date: 13 Aug 2002 23:29:35 +0200 Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <1029274175.1135.129.camel@tux> References: <200208132006.AAA21878@sex.inr.ac.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru In-Reply-To: <200208132006.AAA21878@sex.inr.ac.ru> List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:06, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote: > Hello! > > > Alexey, when you had checksum problems, did you see invalid checksums in > > tcpdump? > > No. It is dubiously similar to your case. It is the sibj > "Linux TCP problem while talking to hostme.bkbits.net" in linux-kernel. > It is mistique not less than your case. :-) > > > Does anyone else have an idea or suggestion I can try? > > Well, let's look what exactly checksum routines calculate on the steps. > Maybe, this will give a clue. Just tell me what you want me to dig out from the checksumming stuff. > Actually, tulip is really different of another cards, this creature > generates badly aligned packets. F.e. it is possible a checksumming routine > folds some bytes beyond end of frame. :-) I have lots of verious tulips here, > but have never seen such a shit. :-) hehe, this isn't a clone, it's a quad with "Digital DS21143 Tulip rev 65" chips (from tulip driver) behind a "PCI bridge: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21152" (from lspci) -- /Martin Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.