From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Josefsson Subject: Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19 Date: 14 Aug 2002 01:02:21 +0200 Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <1029279741.772.134.camel@tux> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Julian Anastasov In-Reply-To: List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 03:38, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote: > > > Well, if this is only in combination with zero length, it is not a disaster. > > May be. It seems there were no such callers but they > appeared. I'm not sure a comment can avoid further problems. > As for the fix, we don't see often lengths of 0 and 1 for > unaligned addrs, it is in the slow path in csum_partial. IMHO, > it will not hurt if we apply the fix instead of auditing everything. I applied the patch and now it's working fine, both ping6 and traceroute6 seems to be working fine. I'll leave it to you guys to debate this :) -- /Martin Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.