From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 - oddness with IPv4/v6 mapped sockets hanging... Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:50:39 -0500 Message-ID: <1030.1200336639@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <30887.1200209733@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <7197.1200327338@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <200801141136.41140.paul.moore@hp.com> <31130.1200333948@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <32065.1200334930@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1200336639_3045P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Moore , Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:41167 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750851AbYANSus (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:50:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:22:10 EST." <32065.1200334930@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --==_Exmh_1200336639_3045P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:22:10 EST, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu said: > Apparently the only new commit in there since the tree that was in > 24-rc6-mm1 is 5d95575903fd3865b884952bd93c339d48725c33 adding some warning > printk's. Would it be more productive to test against the full tree, or > leaving out the one commit I already reverted? Nevermind... :) The new commit won't apply with the other one reverted - it patches security/selinux/netnode.c which was created by the problematic commit... --==_Exmh_1200336639_3045P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFHi67/cC3lWbTT17ARAhcOAJ4lcOtjiX2KFpgRzThIv7R97jwI/wCfbkON QSI5ZyV+t5auk/buHyMHLt4= =z0oi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1200336639_3045P--