From: Mika Liljeberg <mika.liljeberg@welho.com>
To: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, Jon Grimm <jgrimm2@us.ibm.com>,
davem@redhat.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support.
Date: 14 Jan 2003 08:46:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1042526764.2606.21.camel@devil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0301131651170.1861-100000@dyn9-47-18-98.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 02:56, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2003, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know this is not what the SCTP spec recommends with IPv4, but what
> > prevents you from just fragmenting the IP packets at the source and
> > setting the DF bit on each fragment (assuming you can't just repackage
> > the data chunks)? This would be equivalent to the IPv6 behaviour and
> > would keep PMTUD working perfectly.
>
> SCTP does segment the packets based on the current PMTU and sets DF bit to not
> allowing IP fragmentation. The problem occurs when the PMTU shrinks and there
> are outstanding segmented packets which need to be retransmitted. We cannot
> re-segment these packets, but would like IP to fragment them by not setting
> DF bit.
Setting DF=0 allows intermediate routers to fragment the packets as
well. I was proposing that you allow the IP layer to fragment the
packets at source host only, and then set DF=1 on the IP fragments. This
should keep PMTUD working nicely, since intermediate routers are not
allowed to refragment.
MikaL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-14 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3E1CCD72.6020100@us.ibm.com>
2003-01-13 20:48 ` SCTP path mtu support needs some ip layer support kuznet
2003-01-13 21:07 ` Andi Kleen
2003-01-13 21:21 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2003-01-13 21:25 ` kuznet
2003-01-13 23:34 ` Jon Grimm
2003-01-13 22:54 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2003-01-13 23:03 ` Mika Liljeberg
2003-01-14 0:56 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2003-01-14 6:46 ` Mika Liljeberg [this message]
2003-01-13 23:22 ` kuznet
2003-01-14 0:49 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2003-01-14 1:22 ` kuznet
2003-01-14 18:44 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2003-01-14 20:11 ` Mika Liljeberg
2003-01-14 22:15 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2003-01-14 21:16 ` kuznet
2003-01-08 23:04 Sridhar Samudrala
2003-01-08 23:06 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-08 22:48 ` Jon Grimm
2003-01-08 23:45 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-08 23:56 ` Nivedita Singhvi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1042526764.2606.21.camel@devil \
--to=mika.liljeberg@welho.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=jgrimm2@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).