netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@genband.com>,
	andy@greyhouse.net, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] bonding, slave selection, carrier loss, etc.
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:37:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10446.1329165449@death.nxdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329164644.2697.49.camel@bwh-desktop>

Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:48 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:16:59 -0600
>> Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@genband.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > On 02/11/2012 12:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > > On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 17:53 -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> > >> Chris Friesen<chris.friesen@genband.com>  wrote:
>> > 
>> > >>> The best solution would be for bonding to just register for notification
>> > >>> of the link going down.  Presumably most drivers should be doing that
>> > >>> properly by now, and for devices that get interrupt-driven notification
>> > >>> of link status changes this would allow the bonding code to react much
>> > >>> quicker.
>> > >>
>> > >> 	A quick look at some drivers shows that at least acenic still
>> > >> doesn't do netif_carrier_off, so converting entirely to a notifier-based
>> > >> failover mechanism would break drivers that work today.
>> > > [...]
>> > >
>> > > It might be worth having some sort of feature flag (in priv_flags) that
>> > > indicates whether the driver updates the link state.  Alternately,
>> > > disable polling of a device once you see a notification.
>> 
>> Just fix the drivers to update link state.
>> The whole mii polling method of bonding is really leftover from the era of
>> 10 years ago when network drivers were stupid and didn't handle carrier.
>
>Lots of hardware doesn't generate link interrupts.  Our SFC4000 was
>supposed to generate events for link changes, but this didn't work
>reliably and so we poll regularly in the driver.  I think the older
>drivers fail to update carrier because of similar hardware limitations.
>
>If you want to remove link polling from the bonding driver then it has
>to live *somewhere*.  Rather than requiring every affected driver to
>implement the timer or delayed work item, I would suggest you put that
>in the networking core and then require drivers to either provide a link
>polling function or specify that they don't require polling.  Then
>export the obvious implementations using ethtool or MII so that drivers
>don't have to replicate those.

	I think it's probably better all around to leave the miimon
(link polling) stuff in bonding alone for those drivers that need it,
and then add a notifier check that will do link down/up on demand if the
particular device does netif_carrier (which will be the majority).

	If bonding is running miimon and gets a notifier from a driver,
then it can stop the polling (as Ben suggests).  For the usual case
(drivers that support netif_carrier), this will be right after the
device is enslaved, because devices are enslaved in a down state and are
set administratively up as part of the enslavement process.

	The only tricky bits are:

	- insuring that the arp monitor and the notifiers don't conflict
if there is disagreement about the link state and cause flapping of the
perceived link state.

	- handling drivers like 3c59x that do their own handling, but
run on a very long poll in the driver (5 seconds for 3c59x).  I suspect
that if use_carrier=0 is set in bonding, then continuing to run the
miimon poll would handle this for most devices (because use_carrier=0
instructs bonding to check the device mii registers rather than relying
on the driver to set carrier).  If use_carrier=0 doesn't work, then
bonding wouldn't detect a link change any faster than the driver is
reporting it anyway.

	-J

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com

      reply	other threads:[~2012-02-13 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <49CD5B93.7010407@nortel.com>
     [not found] ` <31087.1238198438@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>
2012-02-10 23:47   ` [BUG?] bonding, slave selection, carrier loss, etc Chris Friesen
2012-02-11  1:53     ` Jay Vosburgh
2012-02-11 18:52       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-13 18:16         ` Chris Friesen
2012-02-13 18:48           ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-02-13 19:18             ` Chris Friesen
2012-02-13 20:24             ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-13 20:37               ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10446.1329165449@death.nxdomain \
    --to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=chris.friesen@genband.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).