From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy King Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] VSOCK: Fix VSOCK_HASH and VSOCK_CONN_HASH Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 05:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1045033957.4517542.1371818900042.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> References: <1371720033-19714-1-git-send-email-asias@redhat.com> <1371720033-19714-5-git-send-email-asias@redhat.com> <783609149.3265072.1371741133384.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> <20130621002201.GA11759@hj.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Dmitry Torokhov , Reilly Grant To: Asias He Return-path: Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com ([208.91.2.12]:59412 "EHLO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965608Ab3FUMsV (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:48:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130621002201.GA11759@hj.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > [0-250] is for bound sockets, [251] is for unbound sockets, no? Well caught. Acked-by: Andy King Thanks! - Andy