netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@ozemail.com.au>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [2.4.20] Frustrating DNS / UDP Socket flakeyness
Date: 22 Apr 2003 12:05:07 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1050978909.1755.2.camel@dupy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17626.1050885203@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>

Hi Keith, 

Thanks for that, I'll give it a try. 

I've never come across this option before, and after all the years of
using dialup links with 1. and 2. series kernels, have never had this
problem before. It seemed to be a 2.4 series problem. 

It also was strange that it only appeared to happen when the link was
full of incoming TCP traffic. It was as though the TCP traffic was some
how getting priority over the UDP traffic in the incoming queue, which
then cause the socket timeout. 

It has just occurred to me that maybe my ISP is prioritising incoming
TCP traffic over UDP, which is why I only have this problem when
performing incoming (and maybe outgoing) TCP transfers. 

I'll see how I go.

Thanks, 
Mark. 

On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 10:03, Keith Owens wrote: 
> On 21 Apr 2003 02:05:32 +0930, 
> Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> >While a TCP download is running, the UDP / DNS queries are sent, a
> >response comes back from the DNS server, but for some reason, in the
> >kernel appears to have closed the UDP socket, and therefore generates an
> >ICMP destination unreachable, port unreachable message back to the DNS
> >server.
> 
> The response takes too long so the resolver is timing out the request
> and trying another server.  When the delayed response arrives, the
> resolver has closed the socket so the icmp reject is correct.  The
> default timeout is 5 seconds, try adding 'options timeout:10' to
> /etc/resolv.conf.
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2003-04-22  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-20 16:35 [2.4.20] Frustrating DNS / UDP Socket flakeyness Mark Smith
2003-04-21  0:33 ` Keith Owens
2003-04-22  2:35   ` Mark Smith [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1050978909.1755.2.camel@dupy \
    --to=markzzzsmith@ozemail.com.au \
    --cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).