From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Justin Sanchez Subject: Re: [Bug 1030] New: racoon causes oops when implementing IPSec key Date: 03 Aug 2003 01:51:22 -0400 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <1059889883.1187.15.camel@mobile> References: <89550000.1059833972@[10.10.2.4]> <20030802163333.A12217@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <1059850039.1187.2.camel@mobile> <20030802212018.B14141@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2Y8LE63gCCNUG9OvqJTX" Return-path: To: netdev@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <20030802212018.B14141@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --=-2Y8LE63gCCNUG9OvqJTX Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi. I had this problem on 2.6.0-test1 and -test2 and -test2-bk2, so I'll try to report it. I'm new to the scene, so I apologize in advance for this post. Background. 2 machines. e100 cards on each, if it matters. ipsec-tools 0.2.2. I give each of them directives to use esp and ah in transport mode. I turn on racoon on each box. I ping. Both panic. Following is about the message:. Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 printing eip: c02bbd06 *pde =3D 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[] Not tainted EFLAGS: 00010206 EIP is at memcpy+0x1e/0x39 eax: 00000018 ebx: f6fe8a00 ecx: 00000006 edx: 00000000 esi: 00000000 edi: 00000000 ebp: c0562520 esp: f6fb5ccc ds: 007b es: 007b ss:0068 Process racoon (pid: 418, threadinfo=3Df6fb4000 task=3Df6fbb300) Stack: Call Trace: xfrm_state_update pfkey_add parse_exthdrs pfkey_process pfkey_sendmsg sock_sendmsg verify_iovec sys_sendmsg sockfd_lookup sys_sendto sys_getsockname __pollwait update_process sys_send sys_socketcall syscall_call Code: f3 a5 a8 02 74 02 66 a5 a8 01 74 01 a4 89 d0 8b 74 24 02 8b <0>Kernel panic: Fatal exception in interrupt In interrupt handler =3D not syncing If you want the full text of it, its at 67.9.9.32/oops.jpg. I'm probably just doing something stupid... On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 15:20, Francois Romieu wrote: > Justin Sanchez : > [...] > > How current? I've just seen it in -test2-bk2. >=20 > Forwarded to davem@redhat.com. >=20 > You may consider posting the data of the bug-report updated to -test2-bk2 > on netdev@oss.sgi.com. >=20 > -- > Ueimor >=20 --=-2Y8LE63gCCNUG9OvqJTX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/LKLaiLmb/rWLQdQRAmWuAJ4g7wXLF1O+gFi+jrLeThezwWAsywCgkiao YUjA6YtWFR9yOVO/5JnRKZc= =6zEM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2Y8LE63gCCNUG9OvqJTX--