From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: crochu nicolas Subject: Re: [update] 2.6.4-rc2 - Realtek 8169 patches Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:40:57 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <1079098857.2791.10.camel@localhost> References: <20040307023748.A7829@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <1078822878.2408.8.camel@pinacola> <20040311193937.A14638@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UqbdjlJhQ5H9sQYKNmrD" Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Francois Romieu In-Reply-To: <20040311193937.A14638@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --=-UqbdjlJhQ5H9sQYKNmrD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le jeu 11/03/2004 =E0 19:39, Francois Romieu a =E9crit : > crochu nicolas : > > If i apply only these patch, everything goes fine > [...] > Did you stress the driver, say (rsync), ping -f -s 8, ttcp ? > -- > Ueimor I tested with unison, ping -f -s 8 as did a friend with the same hardware. My kernel : 2.6.3 + patched driver ( except the last 3 patch ) My friend : a stock 2.6.4-mm1 kernel. everything goes fine. my friend told me something about the io/schedulers as a source=20 of instability .. i'm investigatng. C.Nicolas. --=-UqbdjlJhQ5H9sQYKNmrD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAUb3pxsSeKWK8V4QRApt9AJ4hVhUEko5pOvq7Kugi7V286pN25ACcDriX FZpegsGLQ//UOzabAH5ACoo= =2YOV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UqbdjlJhQ5H9sQYKNmrD--