From: Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@126.com>
To: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] e1000e: close and reattach the netdev when e1000e_pm_thaw() fails
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 17:01:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093eae1-8ceb-4a6b-9dcc-077e977e4ceb@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179318011223.3327.3243826211150431182@kernel.org>
Hi,
Thanks for the automated review.
On 2026/10/28 17:35, netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
> commit messages seem to be missing some information:
>
> - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
> development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
> analysis tool scan.
>
> - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
> (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
> the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
>
> - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please
> mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for
> testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware.
>
> Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
> reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
> can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
> other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
> then.
>
> The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
> that is the case please reply and explain.
Please find the missing information below.
- Discovery: The issue was found during manual code review/inspection of
the e1000e PM thaw error handling. It was not reported by a user, syzbot,
or a static analysis tool.
- Triggering: The issue has not been triggered in practice. It is based on
code inspection and is currently theoretical. I have not reproduced the
failure path or collected a stack trace/error log.
- Hardware testing: The change has not been tested on real hardware. No
specific e1000e device or firmware version was used for testing. It was
only compile-tested.
I will include this information in the commit message if another revision
is needed for other reasons.
Thanks,
Linkui Xiao
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 9:31 [PATCH iwl-net] e1000e: close and reattach the netdev when e1000e_pm_thaw() fails Linkui Xiao
2026-10-28 9:35 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-30 9:01 ` Linkui Xiao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1093eae1-8ceb-4a6b-9dcc-077e977e4ceb@126.com \
--to=xiaolinkui@126.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox