Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@126.com>
To: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] e1000e: close and reattach the netdev when e1000e_pm_thaw() fails
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 17:01:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093eae1-8ceb-4a6b-9dcc-077e977e4ceb@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179318011223.3327.3243826211150431182@kernel.org>

Hi,

Thanks for the automated review.

On 2026/10/28 17:35, netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
> commit messages seem to be missing some information:
> 
>   - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
>     development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
>     analysis tool scan.
> 
>   - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
>     (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
>     the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
> 
>   - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please
>     mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for
>     testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware.
> 
> Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
> reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
> can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
> other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
> then.
> 
> The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
> that is the case please reply and explain.

Please find the missing information below.

- Discovery: The issue was found during manual code review/inspection of
   the e1000e PM thaw error handling. It was not reported by a user, syzbot,
   or a static analysis tool.

- Triggering: The issue has not been triggered in practice. It is based on
   code inspection and is currently theoretical. I have not reproduced the
   failure path or collected a stack trace/error log.

- Hardware testing: The change has not been tested on real hardware. No
   specific e1000e device or firmware version was used for testing. It was
   only compile-tested.

I will include this information in the commit message if another revision
is needed for other reasons.

Thanks,
Linkui Xiao


      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-30  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-28  9:31 [PATCH iwl-net] e1000e: close and reattach the netdev when e1000e_pm_thaw() fails Linkui Xiao
2026-10-28  9:35 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-30  9:01   ` Linkui Xiao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1093eae1-8ceb-4a6b-9dcc-077e977e4ceb@126.com \
    --to=xiaolinkui@126.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox