From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zilvinas Valinskas Subject: Re: Crypto tests via tcrypt.o modules failes Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:21:26 +0300 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <1095434486.32091.2.camel@swoop.gemtek.lt> References: Reply-To: zilvinas@gemtek.lt Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: James Morris In-Reply-To: Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 17:58, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote: > > > I would say Xscale IXP425 has a rather interesting 32, 16 bits > > read/write results if address is not aligned properly. In the same > > directory - http://www.gemtek.lt/~zilvinas/crypto/ i've put *.pdf > > describing what exactly is happening. > > I've had a report that all is well on an Xscale PXA (SoC) system, with a > 2.6.7-rc2 kernel. Are there any significant differences between that and > what you have? 2.4.27 and 2.6.7-rc2 I think quite different - can you tell me which parts to check for differencies ? Here I use 2.4.27 + IPsec patch (from Herbert Xu) + Xscale bits (arch/arm - directory is only patched). I can do a full diff between vanilla 2.4.27 and what I've got if you like and put on web. > > - James