From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:38:58 -0400
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <1095809938.2340.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20040918203319.24004d6e.davem@davemloft.net>
	 <1095645106.1048.190.camel@jzny.localdomain>
	 <20040919195351.0b3560e6.davem@davemloft.net>
	 <1095686672.1049.301.camel@jzny.localdomain>
	 <20040920121123.70baf895.davem@davemloft.net>
	 <20040921034212.GA28462@gondor.apana.org.au>
	 <20040920231805.3f18479c.davem@davemloft.net>
	 <20040921090423.GE8058@wotan.suse.de>
	 <20040921093252.GA32545@gondor.apana.org.au>
	 <1095764621.1049.14.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
In-Reply-To: <1095764621.1049.14.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 07:03, jamal wrote:

> Important for marketing to be able to claim _full_ RFC 1812 compliance.
> Kepp the TOS!
> I know it sounds silly, but there are a lot more foolish people out
> there addicted to glossyware.

RFC 1812 was written before TOS routes were pulled out of OSPFv2 (due to
too fee independent implementations).  No one implements FIB lookup as
described in RFC 1812 in the core.  What people do implement is PBR, as
well as DSCP-based nexthop selection for MPLS DIFF-TE (RFC 3564).


Regards,

// Steve