From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Cc: jgarzik@redhat.com, hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: R[PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 8/15] wireless/orinoco: Refactor spinlocks so we don't necessarily have to disable interrupts
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:04:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1098817472.3663.66.camel@dcbw.boston.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1098814320.3663.24.camel@dcbw.boston.redhat.com>
Update in-kernel orinoco wireless drivers to upstream CVS.
None of this is original code by Dan Williams, simply a
broken down patch set split-out from upstream orinoco CVS.
o Refactor spinlocks so we don't necessarily have to disable interrupts
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h.8-orinoco-spinlock 2004-10-26 10:44:41.445687264 -0400
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h 2004-10-26 10:45:39.296892544 -0400
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@
u16 channel_mask;
int broken_disableport;
+ unsigned int irq_no_disable:1;
+
/* Configuration paramaters */
u32 iw_mode;
int prefer_port3;
@@ -129,11 +131,17 @@
extern inline int orinoco_lock(struct orinoco_private *priv,
unsigned long *flags)
{
- spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, *flags);
+ if (priv->irq_no_disable)
+ spin_lock_bh(&priv->lock);
+ else
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, *flags);
if (priv->hw_unavailable) {
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "orinoco_lock() called with hw_unavailable (dev=%p)\n",
+ DEBUG(1, "orinoco_lock() called with hw_unavailable (dev=%p)\n",
priv->ndev);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, *flags);
+ if (priv->irq_no_disable)
+ spin_unlock_bh(&priv->lock);
+ else
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, *flags);
return -EBUSY;
}
return 0;
@@ -142,7 +150,27 @@
extern inline void orinoco_unlock(struct orinoco_private *priv,
unsigned long *flags)
{
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, *flags);
+ if (priv->irq_no_disable)
+ spin_unlock_bh(&priv->lock);
+ else
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, *flags);
+}
+
+extern inline void orinoco_spin_lock(struct orinoco_private *priv)
+{
+ if (priv->irq_no_disable)
+ spin_lock_bh(&priv->lock);
+ else
+ spin_lock_irq(&priv->lock);
}
+extern inline void orinoco_spin_unlock(struct orinoco_private *priv)
+{
+ if (priv->irq_no_disable)
+ spin_unlock_bh(&priv->lock);
+ else
+ spin_unlock_irq(&priv->lock);
+}
+
+
#endif /* _ORINOCO_H */
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.c.8-orinoco-spinlock 2004-10-26 10:44:41.444687416 -0400
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.c 2004-10-26 10:45:39.301891784 -0400
@@ -699,13 +699,13 @@
/* We mustn't use orinoco_lock() here, because we need to be
able to close the interface even if hw_unavailable is set
(e.g. as we're released after a PC Card removal) */
- spin_lock_irq(&priv->lock);
+ orinoco_spin_lock(priv);
priv->open = 0;
err = __orinoco_down(dev);
- spin_unlock_irq(&priv->lock);
+ orinoco_spin_unlock(priv);
return err;
}
@@ -1966,7 +1966,7 @@
return;
}
- spin_lock_irq(&priv->lock); /* This has to be called from user context */
+ orinoco_spin_lock(priv); /* This has to be called from user context */
priv->hw_unavailable--;
@@ -1981,7 +1981,7 @@
dev->trans_start = jiffies;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&priv->lock);
+ orinoco_spin_unlock(priv);
return;
}
@@ -2404,9 +2404,9 @@
/* Make the hardware available, as long as it hasn't been
* removed elsewhere (e.g. by PCMCIA hot unplug) */
- spin_lock_irq(&priv->lock);
+ orinoco_spin_lock(priv);
priv->hw_unavailable--;
- spin_unlock_irq(&priv->lock);
+ orinoco_spin_unlock(priv);
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: ready\n", dev->name);
--- ./orinoco_cs.c.8-orinoco-spinlock 2004-10-26 10:44:41.440688024 -0400
+++ ./orinoco_cs.c 2004-10-26 10:45:39.303891480 -0400
@@ -513,12 +513,12 @@
case CS_EVENT_CARD_REMOVAL:
link->state &= ~DEV_PRESENT;
if (link->state & DEV_CONFIG) {
- orinoco_lock(priv, &flags);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
netif_device_detach(dev);
priv->hw_unavailable++;
-
- orinoco_unlock(priv, &flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
}
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-26 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-26 18:12 [PATCHES] wireless: Update in-kernel orinoco driver Dan Williams
2004-10-26 18:33 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 1/15] wireless/orinoco: Use msleep() instead of hardcoded schedule_timeout()s Dan Williams
2004-10-26 18:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-26 19:35 ` Dan Williams
2004-10-26 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-26 19:55 ` Dan Williams
2004-10-27 3:13 ` David Gibson
2004-10-27 13:11 ` Dan Williams
2004-10-28 1:42 ` David Gibson
2004-10-26 19:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-26 18:38 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 1/15] wireless/orinoco: use msleep() Dan Williams
2004-10-26 18:39 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 2/15] wireless/orinoco: fix up printk text Dan Williams
2004-10-26 18:43 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 3/15] wireless/orinoco: encapsulate direct hardware operations Dan Williams
2004-10-27 3:15 ` David Gibson
2004-10-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 4/15] wireless/orinoco: Update orinoco changelog and module parameters Dan Williams
2004-10-26 19:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 3:15 ` David Gibson
2004-10-26 18:47 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 5/15] wireless/orinoco: Update orinoco pcmcia driver's IRQ handling Dan Williams
2004-10-26 18:51 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 6/15] wireless/orinoco: New device data release function Dan Williams
2004-10-26 18:56 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 7/15] wireless/orinoco: Update card reset/init code and add card-specific data structures Dan Williams
2004-10-26 19:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 4:00 ` David Gibson
2004-10-26 19:04 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2004-10-26 19:44 ` R[PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 8/15] wireless/orinoco: Refactor spinlocks so we don't necessarily have to disable interrupts Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 4:14 ` David Gibson
2004-10-26 19:07 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 9/15] wireless/orinoco: Remove dump_recs in preparation for a more flexible replacement Dan Williams
2004-10-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 10/15] wireless/orinoco: Use wireless handlers rather than ioctl()s Dan Williams
2004-10-26 19:18 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 11/15] wireless/orinoco: Clean up firmware version & capability detection Dan Williams
2004-10-26 19:20 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 12/15] wireless/orinoco: Use netif routines rather than keeping link state ourselves Dan Williams
2004-10-26 19:22 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 13/15] wireless/orinoco: RF monitor mode support Dan Williams
2004-10-26 19:24 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 14/15] wireless/orinoco: add minimal ethtool support Dan Williams
2004-10-26 19:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-27 4:01 ` David Gibson
2004-10-26 19:28 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 15/15] wireless/orinoco: Wireless scanning support Dan Williams
2004-10-26 19:33 ` Francois Romieu
2004-10-27 4:06 ` David Gibson
2004-10-27 2:05 ` [PATCHES] wireless: Update in-kernel orinoco driver David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1098817472.3663.66.camel@dcbw.boston.redhat.com \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).