From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.10-rc1 1/15] wireless/orinoco: Use msleep() instead
	of hardcoded schedule_timeout()s
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:55:12 -0400
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <1098820512.9874.13.camel@dcbw.boston.redhat.com>
References: <1098814320.3663.24.camel@dcbw.boston.redhat.com>
	 <1098815604.3663.35.camel@dcbw.boston.redhat.com>
	 <20041026184749.GA16621@infradead.org>
	 <1098819336.9874.11.camel@dcbw.boston.redhat.com>
	 <20041026194219.GA17343@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, jgarzik@redhat.com, hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041026194219.GA17343@infradead.org>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

I will leave that do David/jgarzik since I didn't actually write any of
this code, I just broke the megadiff down.

Dan

On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 20:42 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:35:36PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > New description:
> > 
> > o Use msleep() instead of hardcoded schedule_timeout()s
> > o Normalize sleep calls to use msleep() everywhere
> 
> care to explain what's the point of the latter?
>