From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
horms@kernel.org, jiri@resnulli.us, edumazet@google.com,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
carges@cloudflare.com, kernel-team@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: sched: sfq: add detailed drop reasons for monitoring
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 20:11:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10ae780e-07a3-42bd-8f05-cf4f7721a325@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78899cbc-3e1f-4f84-83a1-a2a5e6301c05@redhat.com>
On 29/01/2026 11.36, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 1/23/26 1:18 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> Add specific drop reasons to SFQ qdisc to improve packet drop
>> observability and monitoring capabilities. This change replaces
>> generic qdisc_drop() calls with qdisc_drop_reason() to provide
>> granular metrics about different drop scenarios in production
>> environments.
>>
>> Two new drop reasons are introduced:
>>
>> - SKB_DROP_REASON_QDISC_SFQ_MAXFLOWS: Used when a new flow cannot
>> be created because the maximum number of flows (flows parameter)
>> has been reached and no free flow slots are available.
>>
>> - SKB_DROP_REASON_QDISC_SFQ_MAXDEPTH: Used when a flow's queue
>> length exceeds the per-flow depth limit (depth parameter),
>> triggering either tail drop or head drop depending on headdrop
>> configuration.
>>
>> The existing SKB_DROP_REASON_QDISC_OVERLIMIT is used in sfq_drop()
>> when the overall qdisc limit is exceeded and packets are dropped
>> from the longest queue.
>>
>> The naming uses qdisc-specific drop reasons tied to SFQ tunables,
>> following the pattern established by Eric's FQ commit 5765c7f6e317
>> ("net_sched: sch_fq: add three drop_reason") which introduced
>> FQ_BAND_LIMIT, FQ_HORIZON_LIMIT, and FQ_FLOW_LIMIT.
>>
>> The new drop reasons are inserted in the middle of the enum after
>> SKB_DROP_REASON_QDISC_CONGESTED to group all qdisc-related reasons
>> together. While drop reason enum values are not UAPI, the enum
>> names implicitly become UAPI as userspace tools rely on BTF to
>> resolve names to values. This makes middle-insertion safe as long
>> as names remain stable.
>>
>> These detailed drop reasons enable production monitoring systems
>> to distinguish between different SFQ drop scenarios and generate
>> specific metrics for:
>> - Flow table exhaustion (flows exceeded)
>> - Per-flow congestion (depth limit exceeded)
>> - Global qdisc congestion (overall limit exceeded)
>>
>> This granular visibility allows operators to identify capacity
>> planning needs, detect traffic patterns, and optimize SFQ
>> configuration based on real-world drop patterns.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
>
> Given the lack of endorsing from any 3rd party, the possible BPF
> alternative and the previous controversial conversation, I'm also not
> going to apply this change, sorry.
I agree that we need someone else "3rd party" to review and ACK this
patch *before* it can be applied. I talked to Toke and Simon yesterday,
and they have promised to take a look. So, I ask for some time for
them to review it.
I think this patch is simply following the same pattern as existing
code, that adds similar drop_reasons like FQ and CAKE did. I
unfortunately think it complicated the discussion that I explained *my*
complicated/advanced use-case. I think these drop_reasons are generally
practical for others to use. It makes is really easy to troubleshoot
qdisc code issues for debugging, where we want these drop_reason to
quickly identify the code (and not be too general).
Like Eric shows in commit 5765c7f6e317 this is also usable from perf:
perf record -a -e skb:kfree_skb sleep 1; perf script
--Jesper
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-23 12:18 [PATCH net-next v3] net: sched: sfq: add detailed drop reasons for monitoring Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-01-29 10:36 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-01-29 19:11 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2026-01-30 8:40 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-01-30 16:54 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10ae780e-07a3-42bd-8f05-cf4f7721a325@kernel.org \
--to=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=carges@cloudflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox