From: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@pandora.be>
To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, snort2004@mail.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BRIDGE-NF] Fix wrong use of skb->protocol
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:10:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1104448248.15601.55.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041230222415.GB19587@xi.wantstofly.org>
Op do, 30-12-2004 te 23:24 +0100, schreef Lennert Buytenhek:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 07:55:14PM +0100, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
>
> > ip_sabotage_out() needs to distinguish IPv4 and IPv6 traffic. It
> > currently does that by looking at skb->protocol. However, for locally
> > originated packets, skb->protocol is not initialized.
> > The patch below instead looks at the version number of the packet's
> > data, which should be 4 or 6.
>
> A while ago there were a number of problems with bridging CIPE ethernet
> devices, which turned out to be the bridge code not initialising
> skb->protocol for locally originated STP frames.
>
> At the time I was told that initialising skb->protocol for locally
> originated packets is required, so that is how I fixed it then.
Hi Lennert,
skb->protocol is not set for locally generated packets when the packet
is still in the IP stack. I don't know what happens with it after the IP
stack is finished with the packet.
The comment in skbuff.h says "packet protocol from driver", from which I
tend to conclude that skb->protocol is only set by drivers when a packet
enters the box. Too bad stuff like this isn't clearly spelled out, the
FIXME for the dst field has been sitting there for probably more than a
year too. Anyway, it wouldn't hurt if the skb->protocol field always
held the right value.
cheers,
Bart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-30 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-30 18:55 [PATCH][BRIDGE-NF] Fix wrong use of skb->protocol Bart De Schuymer
2004-12-30 22:24 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-30 23:10 ` Bart De Schuymer [this message]
2004-12-31 0:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-31 8:33 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-31 10:51 ` Bart De Schuymer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1104448248.15601.55.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bdschuym@pandora.be \
--cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=snort2004@mail.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).