From: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Linux Audit Discussion <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add audit uid to netlink credentials
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 08:50:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1107960659.4837.9.camel@serge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1107958621.19262.524.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 14:17 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> The only time it's possibly worth verifying it is for the case where
> userspace is sending AUDIT_USER messages -- for which the process needs
> CAP_AUDIT_WRITE anyway.
CAP_AUDIT_WRITE is needed, but not CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL, which is needed to
set the loginuid. Of course, an LSM could check at
security_netlink_send whether the login_uid in the payload is the same
as the real loginuid. Otherwise, we're wasting a (very precious)
capability bit.
In either case, have we decided we don't want it in the netlink
credentials after all?
thanks,
-serge
--
Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-09 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-04 16:58 [PATCH] Add audit uid to netlink credentials Serge E. Hallyn
2005-02-08 6:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-02-09 13:34 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-09 14:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-02-09 14:19 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2005-02-09 16:49 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2005-02-09 18:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-02-09 18:53 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-09 14:17 ` David Woodhouse
2005-02-09 14:50 ` Serge Hallyn [this message]
2005-02-09 18:23 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-09 18:37 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-09 18:40 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-09 23:38 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-09 23:56 ` David Woodhouse
2005-02-10 0:19 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-10 9:20 ` David Woodhouse
2005-02-10 12:40 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-10 12:49 ` David Woodhouse
2005-02-10 17:14 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-10 1:11 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-10 12:36 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-10 12:51 ` Stephen Smalley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-10 14:37 Chad Hanson
2005-02-10 14:56 ` David Woodhouse
2005-02-10 17:52 ` Klaus Weidner
2005-02-10 18:10 ` Casey Schaufler
2005-02-10 19:26 ` Klaus Weidner
2005-02-10 15:16 Chad Hanson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1107960659.4837.9.camel@serge \
--to=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).