From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:04:54 -0600 Message-ID: <1112198694.5452.15.camel@mulgrave> References: <20050326224621.61f6d917.davem@davemloft.net> <1112027284.5531.27.camel@mulgrave> <20050329152008.GD63268@muc.de> <1112116762.5088.65.camel@beastie> <1112130512.1077.107.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050330152208.GB12672@muc.de> <20050330153313.GD32111@g5.random> <20050330153948.GE12672@muc.de> <20050330154418.GE32111@g5.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Andi Kleen , jamal , Dmitry Yusupov , mpm@selenic.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, open-iscsi@googlegroups.com, ksummit-2005-discuss@thunk.org, netdev Return-path: To: Rik van Riel In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 10:50 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > Agreed, this is definately solvable. If people don't agree, > we should probably fight this out at the kernel summit. ;) So just to make this explicit, we kill this thread and lobby for a topic at the kernel summit discussing the problem of storage over net and the ways of solving it. Yes, I think that's a very good idea. James