From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: take 2-2 WAS(Re: PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events Date: 04 Apr 2005 09:16:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1112620614.1088.489.camel@jzny.localdomain> References: <1112403845.1088.14.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050402012813.GA24575@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112406164.1088.54.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050402014619.GB24861@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112469601.1088.173.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1112538718.1096.394.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050404005805.GA16543@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112614706.1096.439.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050404121641.GA12103@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112619096.1088.473.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050404130224.GA12546@gondor.apana.org.au> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick McHardy , Masahide NAKAMURA , "David S. Miller" , netdev Return-path: To: Herbert Xu In-Reply-To: <20050404130224.GA12546@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 09:02, Herbert Xu wrote: > > -static struct list_head xfrm_km_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(xfrm_km_list); > > -static DEFINE_RWLOCK(xfrm_km_lock); > > All I wanted was to leave these lines as is so that they didn't > appear in the patch at all (except as conext) :) > > When reviewing patches the most annoying thing is to see things > moved around or rearranged because that distracts the reviewer > from the substantiative changes. Ok, fair enough. It annoys me too when i review patches ;-> So i will fix this before final. > > > ;-> Yes, indeed. I think its time for you to throw in the towel ;-> > > Alright I give in :) Goody - now we can have Masahide run his full test. cheers, jamal