netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:14:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1113826496.7419.78.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C925F8B43D79CC49ACD0601FB68FF50C03A633C7@orsmsx408>

Jesse,

I doubt your problem has to do with interrupt rates.
If you say the CPU is "fast" - then the problem is elsewhere.
A fast machine that cant handle 77K interupt/sec would be a pathetic
one.
It could be the PCI IO rate which such a fast system shouldnt have
issues handling.
 
You say it can process upto two packets/interupt -so thats
pretty fast. Actually it could be the e100 issue - try replacing the NIC
with e1000 and repeat your tests and see if you observe the same
issues. 
If you are doing the netperf tests then collect netstat -s output;
/proc/net/softnet_stat is another useful stat to look at.

cheers,
jamal 

On Sun, 2005-17-04 at 23:11 -0700, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> _Summary_
> As the part owner of the e100 driver, this issue has been nagging at me
> for a while.  NAPI seems to be able to swamp a system with interrupts
> and context switches.   In this case the system does not respond to
> having zero cpu cycles available by polling more, as I figured it would.
> This was mostly based on observation, but I included some quick data
> gathering for this mail.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-18 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-18  6:11 NAPI, e100, and system performance problem Brandeburg, Jesse
2005-04-18 12:14 ` jamal [this message]
2005-04-18 15:36 ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-18 16:55 ` Arthur Kepner
2005-04-18 19:34   ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-18 20:26   ` jamal
2005-04-19  5:55     ` Greg Banks
2005-04-19 18:36       ` David S. Miller
2005-04-19 20:38         ` NAPI and CPU utilization [was: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem] Arthur Kepner
2005-04-19 20:52           ` Rick Jones
2005-04-19 21:09           ` David S. Miller
     [not found]         ` <20050420145629.GH19415@sgi.com>
2005-04-20 15:15           ` NAPI, e100, and system performance problem jamal
2005-04-22 11:36       ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-22 12:33         ` jamal
2005-04-22 17:21           ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-22 18:18             ` jamal
2005-04-22 18:30               ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-22 18:37                 ` Arthur Kepner
2005-04-22 18:52                   ` David S. Miller
     [not found]                     ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504241845070.2934@linux.site>
2005-04-25 11:25                       ` jamal
2005-04-25 18:51                         ` David S. Miller
2005-04-25 11:41                       ` jamal
2005-04-25 12:16                         ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2005-04-22 19:01                 ` jamal
2005-04-22 19:07                   ` David S. Miller
2005-04-22 19:21                     ` jamal
2005-04-23 20:50                       ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-23 16:56                 ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-22 23:28               ` Greg Banks
2005-04-22 23:40                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-04-22 23:43                   ` David S. Miller
2005-04-23  2:51                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-04-23 17:54                       ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-23  3:04                     ` jamal
2005-04-23 17:14                     ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-22 14:52         ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-22 15:37           ` jamal
2005-04-22 17:22             ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1113826496.7419.78.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).