From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:21:29 -0400 Message-ID: <1114197689.7978.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1113855967.7436.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050419055535.GA12211@sgi.com> <1114173195.7679.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050422172108.GA10598@muc.de> <1114193902.7978.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050422183004.GC10598@muc.de> <1114196487.7978.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050422120714.35f56e76.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ak@muc.de, gnb@sgi.com, akepner@sgi.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20050422120714.35f56e76.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-22-04 at 12:07 -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > Let's get people testing changes like that to see if it undoes > the bad cases. I want to do something proactive with these > reports instead of just asking for more performance data like > a bunch of crazed lunatics :-) But we are crazed lunatics ;-> I have a feeling that the patch will solve the problem and we wont have the fun of seeing interesting data. cheers, jamal