From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 07:41:07 -0400 Message-ID: <1114429267.7669.160.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1113855967.7436.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050419055535.GA12211@sgi.com> <1114173195.7679.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050422172108.GA10598@muc.de> <1114193902.7978.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050422183004.GC10598@muc.de> <20050422115230.6037a362.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , ak@muc.de, gnb@sgi.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com Return-path: To: Arthur Kepner In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Actually, it may be sufficient to collect data for 20, 40, and 80% link utilization for napi, napi+dmiller_mchan and nonapi Same for the e1000. cheers, jamal