From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next. Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:08:36 +0400 Message-ID: <1114582116.14282.25.camel@uganda> References: <20050411125932.GA19538@uganda.factory.vocord.ru> <200504270016.34002.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <1114579926.14282.16.camel@uganda> <200504270046.41042.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Reply-To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vFoTmKJ8c4En+UikOrm6" Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, Greg KH , Jamal Hadi Salim , Kay Sievers , Herbert Xu , James Morris , Guillaume Thouvenin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Thomas Graf , Jay Lan Return-path: To: Dmitry Torokhov In-Reply-To: <200504270046.41042.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --=-vFoTmKJ8c4En+UikOrm6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 00:46 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > into callback queue. Hmm, might be useful if it was, for implementing > various kinds of in-kernel notifications. There was implementation for that, but I dropped it due to broken code [fix was simple, but there is issue number 2] and I think it may end up in various microkerel-alike message queues. Since I worked too much with projects that are based on such design, so I afraid it will be very bad to allow such using in Linux kernel. Although it can be compile-time or something... --=20 Evgeniy Polyakov Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski --=-vFoTmKJ8c4En+UikOrm6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCbyxkIKTPhE+8wY0RAr9oAJ0cfP93igGWrGw9lxnt8/z1zLZD5ACeIEr4 aDWPAjPDKW1Aqt4xff0MOd4= =2d1b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vFoTmKJ8c4En+UikOrm6--