From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: [patch/RFC]: Asynchronous IPsec processing benchmark. Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 17:38:27 +0400 Message-ID: <1115127507.3414.58.camel@uganda> References: <20050429144103.A23268@2ka.mipt.ru> <20050503095312.GA29788@gondor.apana.org.au> <1115115502.3414.22.camel@uganda> <20050503101447.GA29973@gondor.apana.org.au> <1115116295.3414.30.camel@uganda> <20050503102929.GA30097@gondor.apana.org.au> <1115117728.3414.48.camel@uganda> Reply-To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FFK2WSC8sADObNy6J1+q" Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, Patrick McHardy , "David S. Miller" , Jamal Hadi Salim Return-path: To: Herbert Xu In-Reply-To: <1115117728.3414.48.camel@uganda> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --=-FFK2WSC8sADObNy6J1+q Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here are some numbers: ./netperf -l 60 -H gw -t TCP_STREAM -i 10,2 -I 99,5 -- -m 4096 -s 57344 -S 57344 TCP STREAM TEST to gw : +/-2.5% @ 99% conf. async-ipsec, 10^6bits/sec: 35.42 sync-ipsec, 10^6bits/sec: 37.11 So even with existing timer deferring it is not noticebly slower [about 4%]. And I think that benefits it provides definitely cost that price and=20 compile time option. --=20 Evgeniy Polyakov Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski --=-FFK2WSC8sADObNy6J1+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCd37TIKTPhE+8wY0RAho5AJ9rMXgXW4qUErGFYBfH1nLZWVDxxwCdH3ZZ n1R13gy6YosPvqaXG4XfhhQ= =dmqb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FFK2WSC8sADObNy6J1+q--